When people ask me what I do and I tell them I run a credit card comparison site, they generally look away, as if I’ve just said I’m a pimp. Or a crack dealer. Or a crack-dealing pimp. When I tell them credit cards aren’t all bad, they’re skeptical. You probably are, too. I might not be able to change your mind, but if one less person in the world thinks I’d give cigarettes to an asthmatic, this post will have been worth it.
Used properly, credit cards can offer you some real benefits. (Yes, used poorly they can ruin your life, but that’s been established elsewhere. I’m here to give you a few positives.)
Before his trip abroad, J.D. mentioned getting his first credit card in a long time. He talked about the dangers of doing so, but he also exhibited what I’d consider the mindset of a responsible credit card user. This mindset can be summed up in a single sentence, which you should make your credit card mantra:
“I pay off my credit cards on time every month.”
Follow that simple rule and credit cards will be your best friends, keeping you cool in the summer, warm in the winter, etc. When you have made paying off your bill completely each month a given, instead of an option, or a wish upon a star, you have the mindset to take advantage of the two main benefits of credit cards: (1) convenience and (2) protection. Let’s look at each.
Convenience Walking around with a lot of cash leaves you vulnerable. Vulnerable to losing it, vulnerable to having it stolen. And it requires repeated stops at ATMs when you run out, which can be a major hassle. Credit cards solve this problem. You can use them almost anywhere today, for even the smallest purchases.
In addition, credit cards are often necessary for travel, especially if you book airline flights online or want to make advance reservations for a rental car or hotel. In many cases, you simply can’t do these things without a credit card. At best, it’s a hassle. Maybe that’s fair, but it’s reality.
Also, when you travel abroad, as J.D. has just done, a credit card allows you to make purchases more easily and often more cheaply, without having to pay international ATM fees or deal with travelers checks.
Protection If you lose your credit card, or someone steals it and hits the bars, your credit card company can not legally make you liable for any more than $50 of those fraudulent charges; in reality, most credit card companies won’t charge you at all, because they want to keep you as a customer.
Credit cards also protect you as a buyer. If you make a purchase and the item breaks, or is lost while being delivered, or a company won’t give you a refund, your credit card company will go to bat for you. Call them up, say you want to dispute a charge on your card, tell them why, and in most cases they’ll erase your debt and go after the merchant that stiffed you. Now it’s between them—as far as you’re concerned, the matter is over.
But Wait! There’s More!: Bonus Benefits There are two more fringe benefits to consider, although I believe they are less important.
Over 75% of the credit cards on the market today offer some sort of rewards program, whether it’s getting a small percentage of cash back, points toward merchandise and gift cards, or airline miles. In most cases, these reward programs are free—you don’t pay an annual fee to get them. So, as long as you are following your mantra (“I pay off my credit cards on time every month.”), you get free stuff for using your credit card. These rewards can be lucrative if you’re a big spender, but I suggest you only think of them as fun extras; otherwise you can become obsessed with racking up points and do something stupid with your credit card.
Credit cards are a free short-term loan. While I don’t suggest you think of them as free money, I do suggest that you think of them as a convenient way to save yourself from forking over big wads of cash for no reason. Example: You want to book a flight today, while rates are lower, for a vacation that won’t occur for two months. If you even have the option to pay cash, it will mean paying an awful lot upfront for something you won’t be using for a while. A credit card lets you make that purchase quickly and easily, with no interest for the month in between when you bought the ticket and when your credit card bill is due.
Credit Cards’ Evil Ways If you think I’m a shill for credit card companies, let me set you straight by telling you this: Credit card companies want you to screw up. They want you to forget your mantra. They want you to pay off only part of your balance, pay it late, maybe even go over your credit limit. When you do, they’ll pounce, gleefully charging you out the wazoo for each mistake and showing no mercy when you say “It’s never happened before” and “Can’t you make an exception this one time?” These days, credit card companies are making less and less money from interest charges and more and more from fees, so they need you to screw up.
The solution: Don’t screw up.
A Word About Debit Cards Debit cards have increased in popularity, especially among younger people. If you can’t internalize the mantra “I pay off my credit cards on time every month,” then by all means go for the convenience of a debit card and the protection from buying what you can not afford.
However, three words of caution on debit cards:
Debit cards do not offer the same protections as credit cards. First, they offer little extra benefit if you have a dispute with a merchant. Debit card purchases are treated the same as if you made a cash purchase. You may get your bank to help you, but who has your money? The merchant, who is under much less pressure to give it back.
If debit cards are lost or stolen and used fraudulently, you could be charged much more than you would be for a lost credit card—only $50 if you report it within two days, but after that up to $500, depending on how much the card was used. (After 60 days, you’d have to totally eat the fraudulent purchases, but who would not know their debit card was stolen for 60 days?) In addition, if you try to use your card while you are unaware that someone is fraudulently emptying your bank account, this could lead you to make purchases without money in the bank to cover them, leading to the equivalent of bounced check fees. And, of course, when your debit card is used fraudulently, your money is gone from your bank account, and it may be weeks before the situation is handled and the money is restored. Contrast that with a credit card, in which the money you’ve used to make purchases is the bank’s money, not your own, so you do not lose cash when fraud occurs.
This may be a personal thing, but debit cards can make it difficult to keep track of how much money you have to spend. Because you make purchases without getting a running total of how much is left in your account, you must keep track in some way, whether it’s using a checkbook-type ledger or just checking your balance online often. In short, a debit card requires discipline. (In that way, debit cards and credit cards are definitely the same.)
Thank you for reading. Now I’ll go back to stealing candy from babies.
Over the past few weeks, I’ve received several questions about money merge accounts (sometimes called “Australian mortgages”). I haven’t paid much attention to these because I’m unfamiliar the products. But when Abbie wrote last week, I decided to do some research. Here’s what she said:
My financial guy handed me a DVD for United First Financial the last time I spoke with him. Apparently they are a company that uses “sophisticated algorithms” to compute how to best pay down a mortgage using a HELOC and a Money Merge Account, with the end result being that the mortgage is paid off in fewer than 30 years. (Their preferred statistic seems to be 11 years.)
I’m new to the whole homeowner thing, and know there are differing opinions regarding paying off a mortgage early, but was wondering if you’re familiar with this system. I’d appreciate any information or opinion you have regarding money merge accounts or UFF; a bit of web research comes up with inflammatory chats and the company’s own claims, but nothing from a reliable third party.
I spent three hours researching money merge accounts, and was unable to find any better information than Abbie did. From what I can gather, here’s how they work:
The homeowner sets up a home-equity line of credit (HELOC), borrowing against the value of his property.
Some large sum is withdrawn from the HELOC and used to pay down the primary mortgage.
The homeowner does not deposit his paychecks, etc. into a traditional savings account, but applies them to pay down the HELOC.
From time-to-time, another large chunk of money is taken out of the HELOC and applied to the primary mortgage.
In case of emergency, the homeowner takes more money out of the HELOC.
Though the HELOC will likely have a higher interest rate than the primary mortgage, it’s actually cheaper to maintain because of the way the interest is calculated.
In the case of United First Financial, all of the timing for these actions is prompted by proprietary software, for which the homeowner pays a one-time fee of $3500. These prompts are not mandatory, but if they’re not followed, it defeats the purpose of the program.
The consensus on the web seems to be: yes, these programs can help you pay down your mortgage quickly; however, they don’t do anything that you could not do yourself for free. The expense might be worthwhile if:
You want to pay off your mortgage.
You don’t believe you’ll have the discipline to pay down your mortgage on your own.
You do not intend to move — you believe you’ll be in your current house for many years.
But most people with the financial resources to accelerate mortgage payments are able to do so without the assistance of a third party. The easiest (and most flexible) mortgage acceleration program is the one you control yourself: simply send extra money to your bank on a regular basis (being sure to note that the extra ought to be applied to principal). You’ll save nearly as much as you would with a money merge account. (Proponents of MMAs admit this!) If you find after a couple years that you lack the discipline to do this on your own, then you might seek a reputable source for a money merge account.
You can read other discussions of money merge accounts at these sites:
Before you begin a mortgage repayment program of any kind, be certain that you understand the consequences. Accelerating your mortgage payments may provide psychological comfort, but there may be smarter financial choices. Last year the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago released a study [PDF] that found:
About 38% of U.S. households that are accelerating their mortgage payments instead of saving in tax-deferred accounts are making the wrong choice. For these households, reallocating their savings can yield a mean benefit of 11 to 17 cents per dollar.
All of this discussion about money merge accounts is just theory. I’d love to hear from somebody who has first-hand experience with them. Do you love the idea? Hate it? Do you think it’s worth the cost? Let us know!
Note: Just as I was finishing this post, I recieved another e-mail about money merge accounts. They seem to have reached some sort of critical mass.
It is safe to say that purchasing a home is quite possibly the single largest investment most consumers will make during their lifetime. So, it is natural for them to be a bit cautious, ensuring they understand all the market nuances before making an offer on a home.
Unfortunately, that is not always the case. Some buyers purchase on impulse without checking the current market conditions, often times costing themselves money or purchasing the wrong property in the process.
When you are ready to start looking for a new house (after getting pre-approved and choosing an agent to represent you), it is a smart idea to do your due diligence to determine if the local market favors buyers or sellers.
Buying a home during a seller’s market is not ideal but it is still possible to get a great deal if you know what you are looking for and have patience in the process.
As a reminder, a seller’s market is one where there is 5 months (or less) of available inventory for consumers to choose from. Obviously, the less homes available, the fewer options both buyers and investors have. It can also mean a lot more competition for the existing properties as there are less homes to pick from. It is simple supply and demand!
In this guide, we will explore some of the strategies buyers should employ and provide essential tips on how to find the right home in a seller’s market.
Get Ready To Buy
The easiest way to lose out on the home of your dreams is to not be adequately prepared to purchase a home when you start actively looking for a property. You can avoid that concern by getting your finances in order quickly.
Start talking with a mortgage broker, lender, or financial institution before you hit the pavement to go look at homes. Getting a loan pre-approval will show you your loan ceiling (how high of a mortgage you qualify for) and will also tell sellers that you are serious about buying a house.
Once you have your pre-approval, your agent should be able to provide a list (many are automated) of all the properties that meet your search criteria.
In many instances, they can provide a drill-down to a specific home style, price point, particular amenity (i.e. pool, 3-car garage, acreage, etc.), school district, and a host of other key features that may be important to you.
The more specific your list is, the less time you will waste looking at properties you have no interest in, and the faster you will be able to check out the houses on your short list that interest you the most.
View Homes As Quickly As Possible
When there is a high demand for homes, do not be the buyer who waits until the weekend to view those properties. The faster you can see the home, the better chance you have of getting it contracted.
If you wait, others may are also interested in it and the property may already be off the market by the time you get around to seeing it.
As always, ensure you have an agent that represents you assist with all your real estate needs, including getting educated on anything you do not completely understand or need more clarification about.
When you can, have your agent schedule a visit as soon as the home is available for showings. This is especially important, critical even, for houses where the viewing times are limited.
Getting in quickly for a preview could be the difference between writing an offer on the house and continuing your search because another buyer beat you to it.
Eliminate Buyer Drama
When there are more buyers than homes to choose from some consumers can become overly aggressive. It is understandable that low inventory makes for a more competitive marketplace but you need to do everything in your power to steer clear of conditions that drive bad behavior and poor decision-making.
With the potential for bidding wars, above list price offers, cash proposals, and no/low home contingencies, you can easily get caught in a minefield without a solid exit strategy.
For instance, the vast majority of buyers will be looking for a good deal that includes a decent location and a home that is in reasonably good shape. The competition to see these homes can cause some buyers to act rashly when the same homes are being previewed and viewing overlap is occurring.
To the best of your ability, remove yourself from any situation where an altercation may occur, and you will minimize the risk of making a hasty decision to “beat the competition”.
Avoid Overpaying
Home prices often go up slightly during a seller’s market because the supply of homes is limited.
Whenever possible, buyers need to remove as much emotion as possible from their purchasing decision to ensure they do not get into a bidding war or rationalize why it is a good idea to pay beyond what the home is worth, especially if that amount is over the appraised value.
Remember, overpaying today could backfire as the market could become a buyer’s market by the time you get ready to sell.
This is why it is critical to have a buyers agency agreement to work with a real estate agent who understands the local market. Your agent can advise you on the price and provide other relevant information about the community as a whole.
They can also provide tips and information about similar homes in the area that have recently sold or are up for sale.
Once you find a home you want, do not rush into making an offer, even at the risk of losing the home to buyers who are willing to make a quicker decision. Re-look all the numbers and have patience through the process.
You may find you will get the home you want at a price you are comfortable with. When ready, always make a strong offer that will pique seller interest and perhaps get the home before others have an opportunity to bid.
Do Not Ask For Special Treatment
When there is minimal inventory, it is not always a good idea to put too many demands on sellers. This is especially true if the home is getting a lot of activity.
When the market is calm, it is normal for buyers to ask for various appliances like washers and dryers, refrigerators, lawn mowers, etc. as a sort of “freebie” with the home purchase.
You should not apply the same principle in a seller’s market because the odds are stacked in the seller’s favor. If there is more than one offer, you can bet the sellers will take the one with conditions that are most favorable to them.
Often times that is the offer without stipulations so keep that in mind when considering what to ask for as a condition of purchasing the property.
Negotiate In Good Faith
Savvy home buyers will attempt to negotiate for a lower price and favorable conditions any chance they get. You can expect sellers to use their leverage to get the most money for the home they can while giving up fewer concessions.
Being able to bridge the gap and find common ground will help the negotiation process go much more smoothly.
Some of the ways you can accomplish this are to avoid haggling over inconsequential items, determining if the items on your must-have list are really worth potentially losing the home over, ensuring you make a fair offer upfront (fair does not always mean your best offer, but a low-ball offer will typically get you nowhere, especially in a fast paced sellers market), and learning to compromise on issues that appear to be slowing down progress (i.e. closing costs, high cost maintenance/upgrade items, and closing dates).
Buying In A Sellers Market Parting Shots
Buying in a seller’s market is not an ideal situation. However, there are still plenty of opportunities to make it through the home purchase process without much fanfare and still buy the home of your dreams!
If you have a little patience, avoid being bullheaded, and keep your wits about you, the chances of getting conditions and a price favorable to you go up dramatically.
By following the tips provided above you will give yourself every opportunity to turn the home buying experience into a positive one that nets you exactly the type of property you are seeking.
Respect and adhere to the advice your buyers agent provides, while staying within your financial means, and the process of buying a home in a sellers market becomes much less daunting to navigate. Happy house hunting!
Digital software provider Stavvy has agreed to acquire fellow mortgage technology startup Brace in a deal that will boost servicing capabilities the Boston-based fintech can provide.
The deal, which was announced on Tuesday, brings together two alums of Flagstar Bank’s MortgageTech Accelerator program. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
The merger with Brace, which has offices in New York and Los Angeles, will add further capabilities to better facilitate Stavvy’s goal to offer an end-to-end digital loss-mitigation process through self-serve borrower options and are expected to expedite request and review. Brace’s platform also is able to produce a digital asset report based on document verifications.
Stavvy, whose products are aimed at reducing friction and paperwork in real estate transactions through processes such as electronic signatures and remote online notarization, already offered services aimed to address potential borrower defaults. Among the transactions the fintech’s tools can currently support are digital loan modifications, in addition to technology-backed loan closings and title settlements on the origination side.
“Stavvy and Brace’s unified services are set to deliver an unparalleled solution, encompassing every critical stage of default servicing — from the initial homeowner inquiry to the ultimate resolution,” Stavvy Founder and CEO Kosta Ligris said in a press release. “Our unified team of industry experts combined with research and investments in generative AI and customizable workflows positions Stavvy to independently reduce the need for antiquated mortgage processes.”
With the acquisition, both servicers and borrowers will have access to a platform they can utilize when and where needed “on their terms,” Stavvy claimed.
“Stavvy’s vision of streamlining real estate transactions aligns seamlessly with Brace’s unwavering dedication to tackle the inefficiencies and foster transparency within the mortgage industry,” said Brace CEO Eric Rachmel.
Both Stavvy and Brace are previous participants in Flagstar Bank’s accelerator program, which mentors emerging home lending fintechs working across the spectrum of mortgage services. Brace was selected to be part of the inaugural class of startups in 2019, while Stavvy took part in the program one year later.
Flagstar has also served as one of Stavvy’s clients, using the company’s digital servicing solutions to execute remote loan modifications.
To date, the two companies have raised a combined total of $130 million in capital to develop new mortgage technology, according to a Stavvy spokesperson.
The deal between the two companies arrives after the release of a recent report from servicing technology firm Black Knight that found a high degree of willingness among over 300,000 borrowers to use its self-service tool offered by some of its clients to address their loan situations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Homeowners took advantage of self-service for everything from forbearance requests to final loan modification.
Many housing experts think the development of tools borrowers can access themselves will help to ease anxiety among struggling homeowners and help lenders identify potential financial distress early, preventing small problems from turning into foreclosures.
As the new week begins, mortgage rates are almost perfectly in line with those seen on Friday afternoon. Putting that in context, last Thursday and Friday marked the highest rates in weeks although Friday was quite a bit better. In both cases and again today, the average lender is just over 7% for a top tier conventional 30yr fixed scenario.
Last Thursday’s drama stemmed from strong economic data. That sort of data is a key consideration for rate movement in general, but especially right now. The Fed is scrutinizing data to determine whether it’s time to hold rates steady after hiking at the fastest pace since the early 80s.
While the Fed Funds Rate doesn’t dictate mortgage rates, the expectations for future movement in the Fed Funds Rate is much more correlated. Even then, the general notion of “friendly vs unfriendly” Fed policy tends to align with “down vs up” for interest rates. Bottom line: weak data = friendly Fed. Strong data = unfriendly Fed.
With all that in mind, we have some of the month’s most important economic data coming up this week, culminating in Friday’s big jobs report–typically considered to be the most important report for bonds/rates.
The share of refinances in mortgage origination volume dipped below 50% for the first time in 15 months in March, according to Black Knight‘s new monthly data report, the Originations Market Monitor. With interest rates continuing to tick up, the purchase mortgage market is where most lenders will focus operations over the next year.
Since December 2019, millions of homeowners have been able to save hundreds of dollars a month in mortgage payments by refinancing to record-low mortgage rates, often in the 2% range. Thanks to the Fed’s intervention to lower the cost of borrowing, many homeowners shaved 125 basis points or more on their mortgages over the past year. That was a boon for mortgage lenders, the vast majority of which rode the refi wave to historic origination volume and record profits in 2020.
But the strengthening U.S. economy and acceleration of COVID-19 vaccines has pushed interest rates back up dramatically over the last quarter. By mid-January, mortgage rates began to rebound from historic lows, and by the end of March, Black Knight estimated the average 30-year mortgage rate sat near 3.34%. That was up 60 basis points from February, though still down 20 basis points from the same time last year.
In March, the share of refinancings fell to 48%, forcing many lenders to quickly pivot away from refis and toward the purchase market.
“Recent – and sharp – upward movements in interest rates have shifted the mortgage originations landscape very quickly,” said Scott Happ, Black Knight’s president of secondary marketing technologies. “The wave of refinance activity of the last year and some months has suddenly given way to a purchase-heavy mix. The implications of this shift touch nearly every area of mortgage lending, which in turn has implications for the wider economy.”
How outsourcing gives lenders an advantage in 2021’s purchase market
Whether lenders want to lower costs or improve performance, outsourcing can strengthen a company’s operations regardless of the housing market.
Presented by: Computershare Loan Services
Despite refi activity in freefall, overall rate lock volume was up 2.5% in March, with purchase locks jumping 32% from February. Cash-out refinance locks also rose 4% month-over-month.
The three metropolitan areas with the greatest percentage of lock volume was the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim metro, New York-Newark-New Jersey metro and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metro. In the NY-NJ-PA metro in particular, rate lock data was up 11.7% month-over-month, and refis still took more than half of the origination volume.
But the top 20 metros were neck-and-neck for whether purchases or refis made up more of the lending pie.
“This marks the first time – but almost certainly not the last – that purchase loans have made up a majority share of monthly mortgage lending since December 2019,” said Happ. “We also saw credit scores pull back, a trend that’s likely to continue among refis as high-credit borrowers, who have been largely driving record volumes, exit the market.”
If these homeowners do slowly exit the market, credit availability will continue to open up for borrowers with lower credit scores and options for higher LTV products. Zillow‘s senior economist Jeff Tucker estimates this next wave of buyers will be millennials.
“More affordable, medium-sized metro areas across the Sun Belt saw significantly more people coming than going – especially from more expensive, larger cities farther north and on the coasts,” said Tucker. “The pandemic has catalyzed purchases by millennial first-time buyers, many of whom can now work from anywhere.”
On average, Black Knight estimated a typical credit score for a conforming loan was around 751 in March, six points lower than a year ago. On the other hand, credit scores averaged close to 666 for FHA loans, around four points higher year-over-year. According to the report, Black Knight said it’s seen year-to-date increases in the share of FHA and non-conforming originations, while conforming volumes – though still representing the lion’s share of March lending – are down.
The Jefferson Avenue commercial district in Buffalo, New York, is anchored by a supermarket.
There are dozens of other businesses and services along the 12-block corridor — a couple of bank branches, a library, a coffee shop, gas stations, a small plaza with a dollar store and a primary care clinic and a business incubator for entrepreneurs of color.
But Tops Friendly Markets, the only grocery store on Buffalo’s vast East Side, is the center of activity. More than just a place to buy food, pick up medications and use an ATM, the store is a communal gathering space in a predominantly Black neighborhood that, for generations, has been segregated, isolated and disenfranchised from the wealthier — and whiter — parts of the city.
Which explains how it came to be the site of a mass shooting on a spring day in May of last year. On that Saturday, a gunman, who lived 200 miles away in another part of the state, drove to Jefferson Avenue and went into Tops, and in just a few minutes killed 10 people, injured three and inflicted mass trauma across the community.
It is a scenario that has sadly, and repeatedly, played out in other parts of the country that have experienced mass shootings. But this one came with a twist: The gunman’s intention was to kill as many Black people as possible.
To achieve that, he specifically targeted a ZIP code with one of the highest percentages of Black residents in New York state. All 10 who died that day were Black.
“The mere fact that someone can research, ‘Where will the greatest number of Black people be … on a Saturday morning,’ that’s not by chance,” said Franchelle Parker, a community organizer and executive director of Open Buffalo, a nonprofit focused on racial, economic and ecological justice. “That’s not a mistake. It’s a community that’s been deeply segregated for decades.”
The day of the shooting, Parker, who grew up in nearby Niagara Falls, was driving to Tops, where she planned to buy a donut and an unsweetened iced tea before heading into the Open Buffalo office, which is located a block away from Tops. The mother of two had intended to complete the mundane task of cleaning up her desk — “old coffee cups and stuff” — after a busy week.
She saw the news on Twitter and didn’t know if she should keep driving to Jefferson Avenue or turn around and go back home. She eventually picked the latter.
When she showed up the next day, there were thousands of people grieving in the streets. “The only way that I could explain my feeling, it was almost like watching an old war movie when a bomb had gone off and someone’s in, like, shell shock. That’s how it felt,” said Parker, vividly recounting the community’s collective trauma in a meeting room tucked inside of Open Buffalo’s second-story office on Jefferson Avenue.
Almost immediately following the May 14, 2022, massacre, which was the second-deadliest mass shooting in the United States last year, conversations locally and nationally turned to the harsh realities of the East Side and how long-standing factors that affect the daily life of residents — racism, poverty and inequity — made the community an ideal target for a white supremacist.
Now, more than a year after the tragedy, there is growing concern that not enough is being done fast enough to begin to dismantle those factors. And amid those conversations, there are mounting calls for the banking industry — whose historical policies and practices helped cement the racial segregation and disinvestment that ultimately shaped the East Side — to leverage its collective power and influence to band together in an effort to create systemic change.
The ideas about how banks should support the East Side and better embed themselves in the neighborhood vary by people and organizations. But the basic argument is the same: Banks, in their role as financiers and because of the industry’s history of lending discrimination, are obligated to bring forth economic prosperity in disinvested communities like the East Side.
I know banks are often looked upon sort of like a panacea, but I don’t particularly see it that way. I think others have a role to play in all of this.
Chiwuike Owunwanne, corporate responsibility officer at KeyBank
“Banks have been very good at providing charitable contributions to the Black community. They get an ‘A’ for that,” said The Rev. George Nicholas, an East Side pastor who is also CEO of the Buffalo Center for Health Equity, a four-year-old enterprise focused on racial, geographic and economic health disparities. “But doing the things that banks can do in terms of being a catalyst for revitalization and investment in this community, they have not done that.”
To be sure, banks’ ability to reverse the course of the community isn’t guaranteed — and there is no formula to determine how much accountability they should hold to fix deeply entrenched problems like racism. Several Buffalo-area bankers said that while the Tops shooting heightened the urgency to help the East Side, the industry itself cannot be the sole driver of change.
“There are a lot of institutions … that can certainly play a part in reversing the challenges that we see today,” said Chiwuike “Chi-Chi” Owunwanne, a corporate responsibility officer at KeyBank, the second-largest bank by deposits in Buffalo. “I know banks are often looked upon sort of like a panacea, but I don’t particularly see it that way. I think others have a role to play in all of this.”
A long history of segregation
How the East Side — and the Tops store on Jefferson Avenue — became the destination for a racially motivated mass murderer is a story about racism, segregation and disinvestment.
Even as it bears the nickname “the city of good neighbors,” Buffalo has long been one of the most racially segregated cities in the United States. Of the 114,965 residents who live on the East Side, 59% are Black, according to data from the 2021 U.S. Census American Community Survey. The percentage is even higher in the 14208 ZIP code, where the Tops store is located. In that ZIP code, among 11,029 total residents, nearly 76% are Black, the census data shows.
The city’s path toward racial segregation started in the early 20th century when a small number of job-seeking Black Americans migrated north to Buffalo, a former steel and auto manufacturing hub at the far northwestern end of New York state. Initially, they moved into the same neighborhoods as many of the city’s poorer immigrants and lived just east of what is today the city’s downtown district. As the number of Blacks arriving in Buffalo swelled in the 1940s, they were increasingly confronted with various housing challenges, including racist zoning laws and restrictive deed covenants that kept them from buying homes in more affluent white areas.
Black Buffalonians also faced housing discrimination in the form of redlining, the practice of restricting the flow of capital into minority communities. In 1933, as the Great Depression roiled the economy, a temporary federal agency known as the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation used government bonds to buy out and refinance mortgages of properties that were facing or already in foreclosure. The point was to try to stabilize the nation’s real estate market.
As part of its program, HOLC created maps of American cities, including Buffalo, that used a color coding scheme — green, blue, yellow and red — to convey the perceived riskiness of making loans in certain neighborhoods. Green was considered minimally risky; other areas that were largely populated by immigrant, Black or Latino residents were labeled red and thus determined to be “hazardous.”
“The goal was to free up mortgage capital by going to cities and giving banks a way to unload mortgages, so they could turn around and make more mortgage loans,” said Jason Richardson, senior director of research at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, an association of more than 750 community-based organizations that advocates for fair lending. “It was kind of a radical concept and it has evolved over the decades into our modern mortgage finance system.”
The Federal Housing Administration, which was established as a permanent agency in 1934, used similar methods to map urban areas and labeled neighborhoods from “A” to “D,” with “A” considered to be the most financially stable and “D” considered the least. Neighborhoods that were largely Black, even relatively stable ones, were put in the “D” category.
The result was that banks, which wanted to be able to sell mortgage loans to the FHA, were largely dissuaded from making loans in “risky” areas. And Buffalo’s East Side, where the majority of Blacks were settling, was deemed risky. Unable to get loans, Blacks couldn’t buy homes, start businesses or build equity. At the same time, large industrial factories on the East Side were closing or moving away, limiting job opportunities and contributing to rising poverty levels.
“Today what we’re left with is the residue of this process where we’ve enshrined … a pattern of economic segregation that favors neighborhoods that had fewer Black people in them and generally ignores neighborhoods that had African Americans living in them,” Richardson said.
Case in point: Research by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition shows that three-quarters of neighborhoods that were once redlined are low- to moderate-income neighborhoods today, and two-thirds of them are majority minority communities.
Adding to the division between Blacks and whites in Buffalo was the construction of a highway called the Kensington Expressway. Built during the 1960s, the below-grade, limited-access highway proved to be a speedy way for suburban workers to get to their downtown jobs. But its construction cut off the already-segregated East Side even more from other parts of the city, displacing residents, devaluing houses and destroying neighborhoods and small businesses.
As a result of those factors and more, many Black residents have become “trapped” on the East Side, according to Dr. Henry Louis Taylor Jr., a professor of urban and regional planning at the University at Buffalo. In 1987, Taylor founded the UB Center for Urban Studies, a research, neighborhood planning and community development institute that works on eliminating inequality in cities and metropolitan regions. In September 2021, eight months before the Tops shooting, the Center for Urban Studies published a report that compared the state of Black Buffalo in 1990 to present-day conditions. The conclusion: Nothing had changed for Blacks over 31 years.
As of 2019, the Black unemployment rate was 11%, the average household income was $42,000 and about 35% of Blacks had incomes that fell below the poverty line, the report said. It also noted that just 32% of Blacks own their homes and that most Blacks in the area live on the East Side.
“Those figures remain virtually unchanged while the actual, physical conditions that existed inside of the community worsened,” Taylor told American Banker in an interview in his sun-filled office at the center, located on the University at Buffalo’s city campus. “When we looked upstream to see what was causing it, it was clear: It was systemic, structural racism.”
Banks’ moral obligations
As the East Side struggled over the decades with rampant poverty, dilapidated housing, vacant lots and disintegrating infrastructure, banks kept a physical presence in the community, albeit a shrinking one. In mid-2000, there were at least 20 bank branches scattered across the East Side, but by mid-2022, the number had fallen to around 14, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s deposit market share data. The 14 include four new branches that have opened since early 2019 — Northwest Bank, KeyBank, Evans Bank and BankOnBuffalo.
The first two branches, operated by Northwest in Columbus, Ohio, and KeyBank, the banking subsidiary of KeyCorp in Cleveland, were requirements of community benefits agreements negotiated between each bank and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. In both cases, Northwest and KeyBank agreed to open an office in an underserved community.
Evans Bank opened its first East Side branch in the fall of 2021. The office is located in the basement of an $84 million affordable senior housing building that was financed by Evans, a $2.1 billion-asset community bank headquartered south of Buffalo in Angola, New York.
Banks have been very good at providing charitable contributions to the Black community. They get an ‘A’ for that. But doing the things that banks can do in terms of being a catalyst for revitalization and investment in this community, they have not done that.
The Rev. George Nicholas, an East Side pastor who is also CEO of the Buffalo Center for Health Equity
On the community and economic development front, banks have had varying levels of participation. Buffalo-based M&T Bank, which holds a whopping 64% of all deposits in the Buffalo market and is one of the largest private employers in the region, has made consistent investments in the East Side by supporting Westminster Community Charter School, a kindergarten through eighth-grade school, and the Buffalo Promise Neighborhood, a nonprofit organization focused on improving access to education in the city’s 14215 ZIP code.
Currently, Buffalo Promise Neighborhood operates four schools. In addition to Westminster, it runs Highgate Heights Elementary, also K-8, as well as two academies that serve children ages six weeks through pre-kindergarten. Twelve M&T employees are dedicated to the program, according to the Buffalo Promise Neighborhood website. The bank has invested $31.5 million into the program since its 2010 launch, a spokesperson said.
Other banks are making contributions in other ways. In addition to the Jefferson Avenue branch and as part of its community benefits plan, Northwest Bank, a $14.2 billion-asset bank, supports a financial education center through a partnership with Belmont Housing Resources of Western New York. Meanwhile, the $198 billion-asset KeyBank gave $30 million for bridge and construction financing for Northland Workforce Training Center, a $100 million redevelopment project at a former manufacturing complex on the East Side that was partially funded by the state.
BankOnBuffalo’s East Side branch is located inside the center, which offers KeyBank training in advanced manufacturing and clean energy technology careers. A subsidiary of $5.6 billion-asset CNB Financial in Clearfield, Pennsylvania, BankOnBuffalo’s office opened a month after the shooting. The timing was coincidental, but important, said Michael Noah, president of BankOnBuffalo.
“I think it just cemented the point that this is a place we need to be, to be able to be part of these communities and this community specifically, and be able to build this community up,” Noah said.
In terms of public-private collaboration, some banks have been involved in a deeper way. In 2019, New York state, which had already been pouring $1 billion into Buffalo to help revitalize the economy, announced a $65 million economic development fund for the East Side. The initiative is focused on stabilizing neighborhoods, increasing homeownership, redeveloping commercial corridors including Jefferson Avenue, improving historical assets, expanding workforce training and development and supporting small businesses and entrepreneurship.
In conjunction with the funding, a public-private partnership called East Side Avenues was created to provide capital and organizational support to the projects happening along four East Side commercial corridors. Six banks — Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America, the second-largest bank in the nation with $2.5 trillion of assets; M&T, which has $203 billion of assets; KeyBank; Warsaw, New York-based Five Star Bank, which has about $6 billion of assets; Northwest and Evans — are among the 14 private and philanthropic organizations that pledged a combined $8.4 million to pay for five years’ worth of operational support, governance and finance, fundraising and technical assistance to support the nonprofits doing the work.
Laura Quebral, director of the University at Buffalo Regional Institute, which is managing East Side Avenues, said the banks were the first corporations to step up to the request for help, and since then have provided loans and other products and education to keep the program moving.
Their participation “is a signal to the community that banks cared and were invested and were willing to collaborate around something,” Quebral said. “Being at the table was so meaningful.”
Richard Hamister is Northwest’s New York regional president and former co-chair of East Side Avenues. Hamister, who is based in Buffalo, said banks are a “community asset” that have a responsibility to lift up all communities, including those where conditions have arisen that allow it to be a target of racism like the East Side.
“We operate under federal charters, so we have an obligation to the community to not only provide products and services they need but also support when you go through a tragedy like that,” Hamister said. “We also have a moral obligation to try to help when things are broken … and to do what we can. We can’t fix everything, but we’ve got to fix our piece and try to help where we can.”
In the wake of a tragedy
After the massacre, there was a flurry of activity within banks and other organizations, local and out-of-town, to respond to the immediate needs of East Side residents. With the community’s only supermarket closed indefinitely, much of the response centered around food collection and distribution. Three of M&T’s five East Side branches, including the Jefferson Avenue branch across the street from Tops, became food distribution sites for weeks after the shooting. On two consecutive Fridays, Northwest provided around 200 free lunches to the community, using a neighborhood caterer who is also the bank’s customer. And BankOnBuffalo collected employee donations that amounted to more than 20 boxes of toiletries and other items that were distributed to a nonprofit.
At the same time, M&T, KeyBank and other banks began financial donations to organizations that could support the immediate needs of the community. KeyBank provided a van that delivered food and took people to nearby grocery stores. Providence, Rhode Island-based Citizens Financial Group, whose ATM inside Tops was inaccessible during the store’s temporary closure, installed a fee-free ATM near a community center located about a half-mile north of Tops, and later put a permanent ATM inside the center that remains there today. And M&T rolled out a short-term loan program to provide capital to East Side small-business owners.
One of the funds that benefited from banks’ support was the Buffalo Together Community Response Fund, which has raised $6.2 million to address the long-term needs of the East Side.
Bank of America and Evans Bank each donated $100,000 to the fund, whose list of major sponsors includes four other banks — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, M&T and KeyBank. Thomas Beauford Jr., a former banker who is co-chair of the response fund, said banks, by and large, directed their resources into organizations where the dollars would have an immediate impact.
“Banks said, ‘Hey, you know … it doesn’t make sense for us to try to build something right now. … We will fund you in the work you’re doing,'” said Beauford, who has been president and CEO of the Buffalo Urban League since the fall of 2020. “I would say banks showed up in a big way.”
Fourteen months later, banks say they are committed to playing a positive role on the East Side. For the second year, KeyBank is sponsoring a farmers’ market on the East Side, an attempt to help fill the food desert in the community. Last fall, BankOnBuffalo launched a mobile “bank on wheels” truck that’s stationed on the East Side every Wednesday. The 34-foot-long truck, which is staffed by two people and includes an ATM and a printer to make debit cards, was in the works before the shooting, and will eventually make four stops per week around the Buffalo area.
Evans has partnered with the city of Buffalo to construct seven market-rate single family homes on vacant lots on the East Side. The relationship with the city is an example of how banks can pair up with other entities to create something meaningful and lasting, more than they might be able to do on their own, said Evans President and CEO David Nasca.
The bank has “picked areas” where it can use its resources to make a difference, Nasca said.
“I don’t think the root causes can be ameliorated” by banks alone, he said. “We can’t just grant money. It has to be within our construct of a financial institution that invests and supports the public-private partnership. … All the oars [need to be] pulling together or this doesn’t work.”
‘Little or no engagement with minorities’
All of these efforts are, of course, welcomed by the community, but there is still criticism that banks haven’t done enough to make up for their past contributions to segregating the city. And perhaps more importantly, some of that criticism centers on banks failing to do their most basic function in society — provide credit.
In 2021, the New York State Department of Financial Services issued a report about redlining in Buffalo. The regulator looked at banks and nonbank lenders and found that loans made to minorities in the Buffalo metro area made up 9.74% of total loans in Buffalo. Overall, Black residents comprise about 33% of Buffalo’s total population of more than 276,000, census data shows.
The department said its investigation showed the lower percentage was not due to “excessive denials of loan applications based on race or ethnicity,” but rather that “these companies had little or no engagement with minorities and generally made scant effort to do so.”
“The unsurprising result of this has been that few minority customers or individuals seeking homes in majority-minority neighborhoods have made loan applications … in the first instance.”
Furthermore, accusations of redlining persist today, even though the practice of discriminating in housing based on race was outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
In 2014, Evans was accused of redlining by the New York State Attorney General, which said the community bank was specifically avoiding making mortgage loans on the East Side. The bank, which at the time had $874 million of assets, agreed to pay $825,000 to settle the case, but Nasca maintains that the charges were unfounded. He points to the fact that the bank never had a fair lending or fair housing violation, no specific incidents were ever claimed and that the bank’s Community Reinvestment Act exam never found evidence of discriminatory or illegal credit practices.
The bank has a greater presence on the East Side today, but that’s because it has grown in size, not because it is trying to make up for previous accusations of redlining, he said.
“Ten years ago, our involvement [on the East Side] certainly wasn’t what you’re seeing today,” Nasca said. “We were looking to participate more, but we were participating within our means and our reach. As we have grown, we have built more resources to be able to do more.”
Shortly after accusations were made against Evans, Five Star Bank, the banking arm of Financial Institutions in Warsaw, New York, was also accused of redlining by the state Attorney General. Five Star, which has been growing its presence in the Buffalo market for several years, wound up settling the charges for $900,000 and agreeing to open two branches in the city of Rochester.
KeyBank is currently being accused of redlining by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. In a 2022 report, the group said that KeyBank is engaging in systemic redlining by making very few home purchase loans in certain neighborhoods where the majority of residents are Black. Buffalo is one of several cities where the bank’s mortgage lending “effectively wall[ed] out Black neighborhoods,” especially parts of the East Side, the report said.
KeyBank denied the allegations. In March, the coalition asked regulators to investigate the bank’s mortgage lending practices.
Beyond providing more credit, some community members believe that banks should be playing a larger role in addressing other needs on the East Side. And the list of needs runs the gamut from more grocery stores to safe, affordable housing to infrastructure improvements such as street and sidewalk repairs.
Alexander Wright is founder of the African Heritage Food Co-op, an initiative launched in 2016 to address the dearth of grocery store options on the East Side, where he grew up. Wright said that while banks’ philanthropic efforts are important, banks in general “need to be in a place of remediation” to fix underlying issues that the industry, as a whole, helped create. (After publication of this story, Wright left his job as CEO of the African Heritage Food Co-Op.)
Aside from charitable donations, banks should be finding more ways to work directly with East Side business owners and entrepreneurs, helping them with capital-building support along the way, Wright said. One place to start would be technical assistance by way of bank volunteers.
“Banks are always looking to volunteer. ‘Hey, want to come out and paint a fence? Want to come out and do a garden?'” Wright said. “No. Come out here and help Keshia with bookkeeping. Come out here and do QuickBooks classes for folks. Bring out tax experts. Because these are things that befuddle a lot of small businesses. Who is your marketing person? Bring that person out here. Because those are the things that are going to build the business to self-sufficiency.
“Anything short of the capacity-building … that will allow folks to rise to the occasion and be self-sufficient I think is almost a waste,” Wright added. “We don’t need them to lead the plan. What we need them to do is be in the community and [be] hearing the plan and supporting it.”
Parker, of Open Buffalo, has similar thoughts about the role that banks should play. One day, soon after the massacre, an ATM appeared down the street from Tops, next to the library that sits across the street from Parker’s office. Soon after the ATM was installed, Parker began fielding questions from area residents who were skeptical of the machine and wanted to know if it was legitimate. But Parker didn’t have any information to share with them. “There was no outreach. There was no community engagement. So I’m like, ‘Let me investigate,'” she said. “I think that’s a symptom of how investment is done in Black communities, even though it may be well-intentioned.”
As it turns out, the temporary ATM belonged to JPMorgan Chase. The megabank has had a commercial banking presence in Buffalo for years, but it didn’t operate a retail branch in the region until last year. Today it has four branches in operation and plans to open another two by the end of the year, a spokesperson said.
After the Tops shooting, the governor’s office reached out to Chase asking if the bank could help in some way, the spokesperson said in response to the skepticism. The spokesperson said that while the Chase retail brand is new to the Buffalo region, the company has been active in the market for decades by way of commercial banking, private banking, credit card lending, home lending and other businesses.
In addition to the ATM, the bank provided funding to local organizations including FeedMore Western New York, which distributes food throughout the region.
“We are committed to continuing our support for Buffalo and helping the community increase access to opportunities that build wealth and economic empowerment,” the spokesperson said in an email.
In the year since the massacre, there has been some progress by banks in terms of their interest in listening to the East Side community and learning about its needs, said Nicholas. But he hasn’t felt an air of urgency from the banking community to tackle the issues right now.
“I do experience banks being a little more open to figuring out what their role is, but it’s slow. It’s slow,” said Nicholas. The senior pastor of the Lincoln Memorial United Methodist Church, located about a mile north from Tops, Nicholas is part of a 13-member local advisory committee for the New York arm of Local Initiatives Support Coalition, or LISC. The group is focused on mobilizing resources, including banks, to address affordable housing in Western New York, specifically in the inner city, as well as training minority developers and connecting them to potential investors, Nicholas said.
Of the 13 members, seven are from banks — one each from M&T, Bank of America, BankOnBuffalo, Evans and KeyBank, and two members from Citizens Financial Group. One of the priorities of LISC NY is health equity, and the fact that banks are becoming more engaged in looking at health disparities is promising, Nicholas said. Still, they have more work to do, he said.
“I need them to think more on how to strengthen and build the economy on the East Side and provide leadership around that, not only to provide charitable things, but using sound business and banking and community development principles to say, ‘OK, if we’re going to invest in this community, these are the types of things that need to happen in this community,’ and then encourage their partners and other people they work with … to come fully in on the East Side.”
Some bankers agree with the community activists.
“Putting a branch in is great. Having a bank on wheels is great,” said Noah of BankOnBuffalo. “But if you’re not embedded in the community, listening to the community and trying to improve it, you’re not creating that wealth and creating a better lifestyle for everyone.”
What could make a substantial difference in terms of banks’ impact on the community is a combination of collaboration and leadership, said Taylor. He supports the idea of banks leading the charge on the creation of a comprehensive redevelopment and reinvestment plan for the East Side, and then investing accordingly and collaboratively through their charitable foundations.
“All of them have these foundations,” Taylor said. “You can either spend that money in a strategic and intentional way designed to develop a community for the existing population, or you can spend that money alone in piecemeal, siloed, sectorial fashion that will look good on an annual report, but won’t generate transformational and generational changes inside a community.”
Banks might be incentivized to work together because it could mean two things for them, according to Taylor: First, they’d have an opportunity to spend money in a way that would have maximum impact on the East Side, and second, if done right, the city and the banks could become a model of the way to create high levels of diversity, equity and inclusion in an urban area.
“If you prove how to do that, all that does is open up other markets of consumption all over the country because people want to figure out how to do that same thing,” Taylor said.
Some of that is already happening, at least on a bank-by-bank case, said KeyBank’s Owunwanne. Through the KeyBank Foundation, the company is able to leverage different relationships that connect nonprofits to other entities and corporations that can provide help.
“I see this as an opportunity for us to make not just incremental changes, but monumental changes … as part of a larger group,” Owunwanne said “Again, I say that not to absolve the bank of any responsibility, but just as a larger group.”
Downstairs from Parker’s office, Golden Cup Coffee, a roastery and cafe run by a husband and wife team, and some other Jefferson Avenue businesses are trying to build up a business association for existing and potential Jefferson-area businesses. Parker imagined what the group could accomplish if one of the banks could provide someone on a part-time basis to facilitate conversations, provide administrative support and coordinate marketing efforts.
“In the grand scheme of things, when we’re talking about a multimillion dollar [bank], a part-time employee specifically dedicated to relationship-building and building out coalitions, it sounds like a small thing,” Parker said. “But that’s transformational.”
The weekly applications report from the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) wasn’t positive, but it was certainly consistent. MBA said its Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, was down by 3.0 percent across the board during the week ended July 28. The composite index decreased 3.0 percent on both a seasonally adjusted and unadjusted basis. The same percentage decline held for the Refinance Index and both the adjusted and unadjusted Purchase Indices.
Applications for refinancing were 32 percent lower than the same week in 2022 and the Purchase Index was down 26 percent year-over-year.
“Mortgage rates edged higher last week, with the 30-year fixed mortgage rate [increasing] to 6.93 percent and leading to another decline in overall applications,” said Joel Kan, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. “The purchase index decreased for the third straight week to its lowest level since the beginning of June and remains 26 percent behind last year’s levels. The decline in purchase activity was driven mainly by weaker conventional purchase application volume, as limited housing inventory and rates still close to 7 percent are crimping affordability for many potential homebuyers. The refinance market continues to feel the impact of these higher rates, and applications trailed last year’s pace by over 30 percent with many homeowners not looking for refinance opportunities.”
Highlights from MBA’s Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey
Loan sizes yo-yoed again, dropping from last week’s spike of $383,100 to $375,100. Purchase loan sizes, which averaged $432,700 the prior week, retreated to $423,400.
The FHA share of applications increased to 13.3 percent from 12.7 percent and the VA share decreased to 11.6 percent from 12.1 percent. The USDA share of total applications increased to 0.7 percent from 0.5 percent the prior week.
The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 28.9 percent from 28.7 percent week-over-week.
The 6.93 percent average interest rate for conforming 30-year fixed-rate mortgages (FRM) was a 6-basis point increase from the prior week. Points grew to 0.68 from 0.65.
The rate for jumbo 30-year FRM dipped to 6.89 percent from 6.90 percent,with points decreasing to 0.58 from 0.64.
Thirty-year FRM with FHA guarantees had an average rate of 6.85 percent, up from 6.80 percent the prior week. Points ticked up 2 basis points to 1.05.
The rate for 15-year FRM rose to 6.39 percent from 6.37 percent, with points increasing to 0.78 from 0.75.
The average contract interest rate for 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 6.18 percent, a 17 basis point surge, while points dropped to 1.16 from 1.25.
The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of applications jumped from 5.9 percent to 6.5 percent.
An old tool is back as mortgage rates rise: Seller financing often occurs when buyers hope to save on closing costs and sellers want top dollar for their home.
NEW YORK – Real estate professionals report an increasing interest in seller financing for transactions involving residential properties after the rise in interest rates.
Seller financing was almost nonexistent when mortgage rates hit record lows, but it’s not a new tool. It’s used most often when buyers seek to increase their purchasing power by saving on closing costs or paying lower interest rates – and, at the same time, by sellers who want buyers to make a full-price or higher offer on the home.
However, sellers who give buyers the title upfront face significant risk if they provide financing.
David Dweck, a private investor from Boca Raton whose portfolio consists of single-family homes in Florida and North Carolina, says he carefully vets his buyers when he agrees to provide financing.
“I underwrite it as if I’m a bank,” he says. “I want to have a reasonable expectation that the borrower will pay me back.”
Dweck requires a down payment of at least 20% and will only consider seller financing if the buyer pays full price or above.
Danny Hertzberg, an agent with The Jills Zeder Group at Coldwell Banker in Miami Beach, says that while owner financing is often discussed between buyers and sellers, it is rarely consummated. He noted its most likely to occur when the house has either been languishing on the market without any offers, or the offers come in too low.
“There has to be some carrot for the seller to consider it,” he said. “Usually that carrot is a buyer offering full asking price or close to it.”
Source: Wall Street Journal (07/26/23) Friedman, Robyn
Fannie Mae netted $5 billion in profits in the second quarter, up $1.22 billion from the first three months of the year.
Executives attributed the swollen profits to the continued strength of home prices, which have risen 5% in the first six months of the year.
In fact, Fannie Mae is no longer predicting a decline in home prices in 2023. The government sponsored enterprise‘s forecast now calls for a 3.9% home-price increase this year, though a recession is still in the cards.
“The economy has remained more resilient than we expected earlier in the year, but we believe it is still on a decelerating path and additional drags are likely forthcoming,” Chryssa Halley, Fannie’s chief financial officer, said on the second-quarter earnings call on Tuesday. “While noting the probability of a soft landing may have increased of late, our economic and strategic research group expects the economy will enter a modest recession in the fourth quarter of this year or the first quarter of next year.”
Here are some highlights from Fannie Mae’s second quarter:
Single-family conventional acquisition volume was $89.2 billion in Q2 2023, up 32% over the first quarter’s $67.5 billion.
Purchase acquisition volume, 45% of which was for first-time homebuyers, increased to $76.4 billion from $56.5 billion in the first quarter. Refinance acquisition volume was $12.8 billion in the second quarter of 2023, up from $11 billion in the first quarter of 2023.
Fannie Mae provided $104 billion in liquidity to the mortgage market in the second quarter of 2023.
Average single-family conventional guaranty book of business in Q2 2023 declined by $1.4 billion from the first quarter of 2023, driven by acquisition volumes being lower than loan paydowns during the quarter. Credit characteristics for single-family conventional remained strong, with a weighted-average mark-to-market loan-to-value ratio of 51% and a weighted-average FICO credit score at origination of 752 as of June 30, 2023.
Single-family serious delinquency rate decreased to 0.55% as of June 30, 2023 from 0.59% as of March 31, 2023.
Average charged guaranty fee, net of TCCA fees, on single-family conventional remained relatively flat at 46.8 basis points as of June 30, 2023, compared with 46.6 basis points as of March 31, 2023.
Fannie’s net worth increased to $69 billion, up from $64 billion a quarter ago.
Fellow GSE Freddie Mac will disclose its second quarter earnings on Wednesday.