Google “paycheck to paycheck” and you’ll be flooded with statistics that seem a bit suspect to an economist’s eye. Diving deeper into the spending habits of people who say they’re living with every dollar spoken for, it’s clear we’re not all defining paycheck to paycheck quite the same way. And it’s clear that some who assign themselves to this group could just be very efficient budgeters.
More than half of Americans (57%) say they’re currently living paycheck to paycheck, according to a nationally representative NerdWallet survey conducted online in July by The Harris Poll. In our survey, we didn’t define the phrase, as we wanted to measure the share of folks who identify with “living paycheck to paycheck” regardless of their finances. Then, we asked for some budget specifics.
Of those who said they’re living paycheck to paycheck, many regularly contribute to savings accounts (31%), retirement accounts (22%), or emergency savings funds (22%), all of which are important, but none of which are obligatory. And others include house cleaning services (15%) and subscription boxes (19%) among their regular monthly [expenses.
In fact, 42% of Americans with household incomes of $100,000 or more say they live paycheck to paycheck.
So, what does living paycheck to paycheck mean?
By not defining the phrase in our survey, we hoped to understand how people feel about their financial condition more than whether they fit a tidy definition. Generally, living paycheck to paycheck implies all or most of your money from one paycheck is gone before or right in time to receive the next. And for many people, it implies some level of financial hardship.
But, it turns out depleting one paycheck just in time for the other’s arrival doesn’t have to mean financial dire straits. In fact, our survey found many people who place themselves in this category manage to spend on some monthly luxuries as well as have emergency savings and retirement accounts.
Addressing the feeling of financial constraint
When someone says they’re living paycheck to paycheck, it could be that they’re tightly budgeted. Emergency funds and retirement accounts, for example, are generally features of more financially secure households.
Some popular approaches to budgeting involve allocating your income toward various categories — 50% for needs, 30% for wants and 20% for savings and debt payments, in the case of the 50-30-20 budget, for example. And if 100% of what you bring in is earmarked for various purchases or accounts, you could consider yourself paycheck to paycheck, yet still doing quite well.
If you’re feeling like the well is dry when your next paycheck arrives, take a closer look at how you’re allocating your monthly income. You may find yourself on-track to long-term financial goals and able to afford some of the extras each month that enrich your life, even if your spending account dwindles toward the end of the pay period. If this is the case, and the tightly allocated budgeting feels fine, pat yourself on the back for being an astute financial manager. But if the dwindling feels bad, consider budgeting a buffer into that primary spending account or loosening the limits on your variable “wants” expenses each month. In this way, your “fun money” comes from one place, it rarely runs completely dry and you enjoy a bit of flexibility.
When living paycheck to paycheck means serious hardship
For some, however, living paycheck to paycheck happens because the money coming into the home just isn’t enough to cover the needs of the household. In this case, clever budgeting can only get you so far. According to the Federal Reserve, 63% of adult Americans in 2023 could manage an unexpected expense of $400 using cash, savings or a credit card they paid off right away. There’s a good chance the remaining 37% would describe themselves as living paycheck to paycheck.
Building a $400 emergency fund can be a tall order when you truly have nothing leftover at the end of the month. But every bit that gets you closer can be helpful. While you incrementally build a small safety net, have a financial hardship plan in place should things take a turn for the worse.
Prioritize crucial expenses like housing, utilities, food and medical care.
Contact your creditors and other bill collectors to explain your situation and ask about any hardship programs they offer.
Identify local charities and organizations that can help in times of need and reach out to your state or county social services if you think you might qualify for government assistance.
METHODOLOGY
This July survey was conducted online within the United States by The Harris Poll on behalf of NerdWallet from July 16-18, 2024, among 2,076 U.S. adults ages 18 and older. The sampling precision of Harris online polls is measured by using a Bayesian credible interval. For these studies, the sample data is accurate to within +/- 2.5 percentage points using a 95% confidence level. For complete survey methodologies, including weighting variables and subgroup sample sizes, please contact [email protected].
Disclaimer
NerdWallet disclaims, expressly and impliedly, all warranties of any kind, including those of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose or whether the article’s information is accurate, reliable or free of errors. Use or reliance on this information is at your own risk, and its completeness and accuracy are not guaranteed. The contents in this article should not be relied upon or associated with the future performance of NerdWallet or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties as indicated by words such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should” or “anticipates” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements may materially differ from NerdWallet’s presentation of information to analysts and its actual operational and financial results.
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money podcast, where we answer your real-world money questions. In this episode:
Learn how presidential policies on tariffs, immigration, and prices can impact your everyday expenses like groceries and gas.
What can a president actually do to lower prices and fight inflation? Can campaign promises really impact your wallet, or are they just political hot air? Hosts Sean Pyles and Anna Helhoski discuss presidential policies and how they affect everything from the cost of gas to your grocery bill to help you understand the real impact of political decisions on your finances. They begin with a discussion of inflation, with tips and tricks on understanding how inflation is measured, what drives price hikes, and what role the president plays in influencing it.
Then, Anna talks to Derek Stimel, an associate professor of teaching economics at UC Davis, about the economic implications of tariffs and immigration policies. They discuss how tariffs raise the price of imported goods, how immigration impacts labor costs and wages, and what these political policies mean for your everyday purchases.
Check out this episode on your favorite podcast platform, including:
NerdWallet stories related to this episode:
Auto loans from our partners
Episode transcript
This transcript was generated from podcast audio by an AI tool.
Sean Pyles:
What’s the first thing you do when you go to the grocery store? Do you run to the produce aisle and look for the freshest broccoli, maybe? Or conversely, are you heading for the candy section? I don’t judge. But pretty soon after that, you’re probably starting to look at prices, right? The price of, well, everything is a daily question in our lives. So it’s not surprising that prices are playing a part in this year’s presidential election.
Derek Stimel:
I just find it interesting that both presidential candidates have focused on these highly volatile markets, which we often think they really can’t do that much about, and that are often driven by these global forces basically. But both of them have focused on those as their avenues to bringing inflation down.
Sean Pyles:
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money Podcast. I’m Sean Pyles.
Anna Helhoski:
And I’m Anna Helhoski.
Sean Pyles:
And this is episode two of our Nerdy deep dive into presidential policy and personal finances. Hey Anna, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but we’ve got a presidential campaign underway.
Anna Helhoski:
Hard to miss it. Talk about drama. And every great drama has a storyline. One big part of this year’s storyline in the campaign has been prices, specifically inflation and what it’s done to our bottom lines.
Sean Pyles:
Yeah. Inflation hit a high of 9.1% back in 2022, and we’ve been paying a whole lot more for a lot of things over the last few years. And it’s not subtle, it’s very noticeable. Anna, is there anything specific that has popped up on your radar as more expensive than just a couple of years ago? Something where you said whoa, that is way more than I used to pay.
Anna Helhoski:
Yeah. So I have a bread place near me and a few years ago the prices were pretty reasonable for a big loaf of fresh bread, like $6 a loaf.
Sean Pyles:
Yeah, that’s like New York reasonable, I’ll say.
Anna Helhoski:
Yeah, exactly. No, that’s how I gauge everything. But then flour prices spiked and suddenly the price went up to nearly $10, which is way more than I’m willing to pay. What about you, Sean? Did gecko food get more expensive along with anything else?
Sean Pyles:
Since you mentioned it, crickets for my gecko Ozzy did go up about 12%. I now spend a whopping $2.25 a week for those creepy bugs for the old guy. Of course, it’s not just these one-off items, these are just the things that the two of us noticed in spades. Houses are more expensive, cars are more expensive, credit cards are more expensive. It just takes more out of your budget to buy stuff.
Anna Helhoski:
So what can a president do about it? As we heard in last week’s episode, the answer is not a lot by themselves. They often need Congress or the Fed or both, and sometimes a lot of luck to have an impact on the economy and specifically on prices. But that doesn’t stop them from making all kinds of promises about the changes they’d make if we sent them to or back to the White House. Let’s talk about what they can do in reality.
Sean Pyles:
And as we noted in the last episode, we’re not here to take sides or fan the flames of an already contentious political season. Our goal here is the same one we always have at NerdWallet, to help you, our listeners, make smart informed decisions about the stuff that impacts your finances. Sometimes that means choosing a new high-yield savings account. Other times that means voting for the candidate who you believe will help you achieve your life and financial goals.
All right, well, we want to hear what you think too, listeners. To share your thoughts around the election and your personal finances, leave us a voicemail or text the Nerd hotline at 901-730-6373. That’s 901-730-N-E-R-D. Or email a voice memo to [email protected]. So Anna, who are we hearing from today?
Anna Helhoski:
We’re talking with Derek Stimel. He’s an associate professor of teaching economics at the University of California, Davis. So not only is he an expert in macroeconomics, but he’s an expert in teaching it. He’ll help us parse what presidents can and can’t do to affect the price of all sorts of goods that we all buy. Derek Stimel, welcome to the show.
Derek Stimel:
Thanks for having me.
Anna Helhoski:
Presidential administrations tend to take the credit or get the blame for things that happen, at least when it comes to public perception. That means that the Biden-Harris administration has taken a lot of flak from the Republican Party and from many Americans for elevated prices that we’re seeing in the wake of the pandemic. And since we are just a few months away from a new administration, can you talk a little bit about how much influence presidents actually have on inflation and prices?
Derek Stimel:
Normally we don’t think of them as the major driver of inflation in the economy. Usually, it’s things like monetary policy, so interest rates, and the supply of money. Sometimes it can also be things outside of the economy, shocks as we sometimes say in economics. So things that happen globally, for example. Having said that, it’s not to say that there can’t be some causes that are driven by policy of the government. For example, in the current situation, some people do point to some government spending that took place in the aftermath of COVID and the policies surrounding that. That might’ve been some fuel for inflation. But it’s not usually the first thing we think of. In this particular situation of our recent inflation, I suspect it’s not the first number one thing causing the inflation.
Anna Helhoski:
Let’s get into some of the campaign promises that each candidate has made. Some of the promises might just be politicking, but some of it could become a reality. Start off with former President Donald Trump’s proposals. Thus far, there have been multiple reports and assessments from economists who say that his proposals, if enacted, would be inflationary. And one of the main drivers of that projected inflation is Trump’s promise to levy 10% across-the-board tariffs on all foreign goods. Can you explain how tariffs and prices interact?
Derek Stimel:
Tariffs are basically a tax on imported goods. For any tax, it’s going to have the following effects on the market, which is, the tax gets levied, let’s just say it’s the 10% just to have a number. And then the businesses basically have to, in a sense, make a decision about do we absorb this tax ourselves, do we pass it on to the customers, and if so, in what proportion? They may not pass on the full 10%, it’s unlikely they’re going to absorb the full 10% themselves. So there’s going to be a split. So in some loose setting, maybe they raise prices by 5% and they absorb 5% of it to get up to the 10, or maybe it’s 8 and 2, or 3 and 7, or what may be. But the point is that basically, it’s going to lead to higher prices on those products.
So in this particular situation, we’re talking about higher prices for imported goods. And I think as we’re all generally aware from our day-to-day shopping and if we ever look at the label of anything, we buy a lot of imported goods in the United States. So it’s not unreasonable to think that raising taxes essentially on imported goods would ultimately boost the prices of those imported goods and then on average raise our cost of living at least somewhat.
Anna Helhoski:
Now, Trump claims that his tariffs would spur American manufacturing and domestic competition for production. Is that something that does happen or would likely happen as a result of tariffs?
Derek Stimel:
So it definitely can happen that there could be some… you know, businesses have to make the best decisions based on the rules of the game as they are. Raising tariffs would definitely change the rules and businesses would likely respond to that. And so to the extent that they could and that the U.S. was a major market to them, at least some businesses would try to reallocate or relocate back into the U.S. in order to avoid this tariff, basically. But I think the question is: Would that be enough to counterbalance the effect of this higher tax across the board? I don’t have hard data on it, but the likely answer is it wouldn’t be enough. So we would still see higher prices as a result, and so we would have to deal with the consequences. But there could be some reallocation or relocation of businesses for sure.
Anna Helhoski:
Another promise Trump has made is to lower gas prices. Under his first administration, he increased oil production and then Biden went further still. So how much can a president impact gas prices?
Derek Stimel:
The gas market or the market for energy more broadly defined is very much a global market, but the U.S. is in a way in a unique position of being the center of that global market. You hear a lot about that the U.S. dollar is this global reserve currency. Oil for example is usually traded in dollars and that sort of thing. So we do have a little bit more power than some other countries. The answer would be maybe a bit different if it was us talking about Canada doing something or whatever. It is also probably true that gas prices or prices of energy in general are really often driven by these global shocks. So in this particular case, the disruptions that took place due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are really the prime mover probably of energy prices in the recent years. And it’s not clear that any president would be able to have done something about that directly. Obviously, it’s more of a geopolitical thing than an economic policy thing.
Anna Helhoski:
Switching gears again, I’m hoping you can talk a little about the connection between immigration and the prices that consumers pay for certain everyday goods and services. And note for listeners, as you may know, Trump has promised to use law enforcement and the National Guard to deport many millions of undocumented immigrants. Beyond the humanitarian implications and the logistical questions raised by this proposal, what are some of the economic implications?
Derek Stimel:
Kind of a classic way of thinking about it economically, especially when we’re talking about things like inflation, is that we think that business costs basically would drive a lot of inflation, or at least it could be a prime driver of inflation. And inside those business costs, labor costs are often a large portion of those costs. And of course, that has to do a lot with the supply of labor that’s available relative to the demand for that labor. And so we live in an aging society, the baby boomers are basically retiring. And of course, this is reducing our labor supply or at least likely to reduce our labor supply in the coming years. So what that would mean economically is that would tend to push up wages all else the same, which of course then could also push up prices. Businesses, when they face these increased labor costs, have to make a choice about how much to pass on to customers in terms of higher prices.
So with that all in mind, if you also cut off the amount of immigration into the economy, you would think that that’s likely to put further pressure on wages in the economy. It’s going to further, in a sense, reduce or at least not provide any extra slack for the supply of labor, and so that’s going to further push up wages and further push up prices overall. That’s not to say we shouldn’t think about reforming immigration in some way, shape, or form, but that’s just to say economically that if you reduce the supply of labor, the price of that labor, the wages, and all the other forms of compensation that come with it is going to go up and businesses are going to pass at least some of that on to customers in the form of higher prices.
Anna Helhoski:
And are there any specific areas of the economy that could be altered if you deport millions of people who were already in the workforce?
Derek Stimel:
There’s the initial disruption, uncertainty that would surround it, which could shake out in all sorts of ways, many of which are probably not positive. Imagine the local restaurant down the street suddenly loses half its staff. And what are they going to do? So we would expect a lot of service sector jobs to maybe be impacted by these sorts of things, a lot of things that we interact with daily. And then there’s also this issue about if you create shortages in one area, let’s say you create a shortage in one service sector, it could spill over to other unrelated service sectors as well. Maybe now the one sector has to basically go poach employees from the other one. And so maybe it starts to spill over into other areas where you wouldn’t think of, say, quote, unquote, “illegal immigrants” basically playing a role, but it actually could have this cascade to other markets.
Anna Helhoski:
More of our interview in a moment. Stay with us. I want to talk about Donald Trump’s proposal to weaken the power of the Federal Reserve by bringing the central bank under more direct control of the president. And listeners, we’ve said it before, but the Federal Reserve is nonpartisan and operates independently. That means that the president doesn’t tell the Fed what to do and the Fed doesn’t make its decisions based on politics. Derek, it seems like the separation is pretty crucial to ensuring public trust in the central bank’s ability to make decisions. But if Trump was successful in his plans to more directly influence the Fed’s activities, what are some of those economic implications?
Derek Stimel:
Stepping back for a second, we generally think that the Fed’s main role is to keep inflation, especially over the longer term, relatively low and stable. And one element that tends to be critical to that is their basically credibility to commit to that policy of keeping inflation low and doing what it takes. None of us liked in the recent years the interest rates going up, but it’s seen as this necessary thing to do to bring inflation back down to that longer-term goal. And so the concern basically is that a lot of that comes from the fact that the Fed is independent to some degree from the rest of the government. It’s important to understand that they’re not completely independent. The president plays a role in nominating people to serve in the Fed. Congress obviously has to approve these things. But this general separation of like, oh, you can’t tell us when to change interest rates or you can’t tell us we can’t do this policy and we have to do some other policy or whatever, that tends to be important as this inflation fighter credibility that the Fed has.
If that gets eroded, I think the concern would be basically that people in the economy start to not believe in the Fed as much as an inflation fighter. That lack of credibility starts to make people think, “Well, they say they want 2% inflation, but given that they’re tied to the rest of the government, I think it’s maybe going to be more like two and a half, 3%.” So expectations start to tick up on inflation. And one thing about inflation is that expectations really play an important role and they tend to be self-fulfilling. We all expect five, we’ll get five. And so basically the Fed’s independence is one of… There’s some others of course, but it’s one of the main things that’s tying down those expectations because it’s helping the Fed maintain its credibility to be there when we need them to fight inflation.
Anna Helhoski:
Well, those are the main things I want to talk about in terms of Donald Trump, but I want to switch gears and talk about Vice President Kamala Harris’s plans to battle inflation. She recently unveiled a plan to ban price gouging. So first off, what is price gouging and how have we seen it happen?
Derek Stimel:
So in economics, price gouging doesn’t really have a specific definition, to be honest with you, but the loose idea is that it’s taking, quote, unquote, for lack of a better term, “unfair advantage of a situation in order to raise prices.” Sometimes these situations are obvious, which are… There’s an earthquake that happens, let’s say, so suddenly the price of gas and water in the surrounding area is going to skyrocket. That kind of idea of taking advantage of other people’s misery and something that was really out of their control, a natural disaster, that’s really what we see as price gouging. So in this particular context, what we’re talking about with Vice President Harris is this view where, say, for example, grocery stores taking advantage of the circumstances to basically raise prices on their products in an unfair way. But it’s a bit nebulous once you start to get away from things that I think we all would agree are clearly things out of our control, like natural disasters.
Anna Helhoski:
And is there anything already in place to prevent price gouging?
Derek Stimel:
So states generally have laws that prevent price gouging in the situations we’re talking about like natural disasters, so hurricanes and floods and earthquakes, and so forth. What Vice President Harris is really talking about is basically a federal ban across the board on all forms of price gouging. At least that’s what I understand it to be. And we don’t have that. It’s not really clear what the criteria would be for that as well. So for example, if a company raises prices on its products by 5%, how do we decide if that’s just normal market forces or is it price gouging in some ways? In other words, how do we decide the fairness of it all? Generally speaking, in our economy, we let the markets work that out, and then everybody individually makes a decision about, nope, that’s too expensive, I’m not going to buy it, or I guess I’m willing to pay that price, that kind of thing.
Anna Helhoski:
So some critics of Harris’s proposal, including Donald Trump have said that this is a price control. So what is a price control? Why don’t economists like price controls and would Harris’s proposal to ban price gouging actually be a price control?
Derek Stimel:
Basically, a price control is essentially the government setting a maximum price in a marketplace. So sort of saying, “Hey, you can charge no more than X for this product.” And of course, we have price controls in the economy. The ones that people typically talk about classically are certain cities that have rent control. What people are basically saying is that this price gouging idea would in a way limit how much businesses can raise prices. And that would in a way be similar to what happens in a price control situation where the government often does cap how much a business can raise prices.
The good and bad of economics a lot of times is that there’s tradeoffs for everything. Concern would be basically that maybe grocery stores, because that’s the one that’s been central to all this argument, has really been the price of food, is that basically, maybe you wouldn’t see as many new grocery stores opening up, or at least in a lower frequency. Maybe you would start to see the quality of what’s on the shelves in the grocery stores start to decline a little bit. So on the one hand, you get the prices of the things you buy don’t go up as much maybe, but on the other hand, there’s less of them available and at least for some of them, maybe the quality of those products might go down a little bit.
Anna Helhoski:
So beyond preventing price gouging, Harris has also vowed to lower prescription drug prices and she wants to do this with price caps by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices, speeding up delivery of generic drugs, and cracking down on big pharma. So how impactful could some of these efforts be in terms of making prescription drug prices more affordable?
Derek Stimel:
Oh, it could. Not surprisingly, the federal government via Medicare is a huge consumer in this marketplace, which basically means they have a lot of power, market power we would call. In this particular case, the technical term is monopsony power. But basically, yeah, they would have a lot of power potentially to negotiate and there would be spillover effects for people who don’t have Medicare. In terms of being able to lower, say, prescription drug prices by allowing Medicare to do this giant negotiation basically with the big pharma companies, that honestly could have a big impact on those prices for sure, because Medicare is so huge.
Anna Helhoski:
Right. And you touched on housing earlier, but let’s talk a little bit about Harris’s big proposals with her plans to make housing more affordable. One that really stuck out to me is a plan to prevent corporate landlords from using price-fixing algorithms.
Derek Stimel:
This is a brave new world that we’re in, and there’s a lot of times where regulation is behind the technology, where basically a lot of these businesses… And it’s of course not just in real estate, it’s in a lot of other areas as well, in finance in particular, where they basically use these computerized algorithms to essentially search for the deals that they want to transact. Is it price-fixing or is it the fact that all of these algorithms basically tend to point in the same direction because they often use the same data in order to churn through all their calculations? It’s not clear to me, I guess, how that might be enacted and then also what the implications would be.
Anna Helhoski:
And Harris said she would support construction of 3 million new housing units in the next four years, among other plans. And fundamentally, in order to lower housing prices or rent or the supply of homes for purchase, we just need more housing. So could Harris’s proposals spur more construction? And also what can a president do to facilitate housing growth?
Derek Stimel:
So much of this is local. I mean, so much of this is red tape based on local housing boards and all these other types of things, the “not in my backyard” kind of stuff. And so it’s not really clear what anybody at a national level could really do about that kind of stuff because so much of it is all of the local political machines and so forth that basically drive all these policies. As a general idea, I think the basic point that, yes, the way you have to basically lower housing prices or at least keep them from going up as much is to supply more housing, is definitely the answer. Because the housing market in a sense is unique compared to other markets, in that the supply is basically fixed by the number of units and very, what we would say in economics, inelastic. You’re not going to really get around that unless you just simply build more.
Anna Helhoski:
Derek, are there any other proposals from either of the candidates that we’re overlooking that could contribute to lowering prices or to increasing inflation?
Derek Stimel:
I think the last thing I would mention, I guess. I know President Trump wants to increase the domestic production of natural gas and coal and all that sort of thing. And I do find it interesting that both Vice President Harris and President Trump have focused on these areas of inflation. In the case of former President Trump, it’s energy costs, and in the case of Vice President Harris, it’s basically food costs. And these are the things that are specifically excluded by the Fed when they’re looking at the longer-term measures of inflation. So I just find it interesting that both presidential candidates have focused on these highly volatile markets, which we often think they really can’t do that much about, and that are often driven by these global forces, basically. But both of them have focused on those as their avenues to bringing inflation down.
I think the very last thing I might add in, which is probably too big to really get into, is the extent that the deficit and the national debt might play in terms of inflation in other parts of the economy, especially going forward as it’s ballooned a lot. There are some theories out there, for example, that it does play a role in inflation and to the extent that the policies of the two candidates might add to the deficit, and of course, then by extension add to the debt. That could be in a way a hidden inflation factor that we tend to not focus so much on.
Anna Helhoski:
And one we’ll probably pay for in the future.
Derek Stimel:
Yeah, somebody will eventually.
Anna Helhoski:
Derek Stimel, thank you so much for joining us today.
Derek Stimel:
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you so much for having me.
Anna Helhoski:
Sean, there’s something else I want to point out that I didn’t get to in my conversation with Derek, but came from researching an article on this topic, and that’s price tolerance. Right now, people are still pretty price intolerant because so much is elevated from where we remember it being. But if prices actually did drop across the board, it would be a big problem. Economy-wide price drops really only happen when there’s a big recession. And I think Trump and Harris’s campaigns both know this. They can’t bring back pre-pandemic prices, so what they can do strategically is make promises that are most relevant to people.
Sean Pyles:
Right. And last week we talked about how one individual president can’t really transform the economy on their own. But your conversation with Derek Stimel illustrates how a president’s priorities can make a bigger impact on an issue-by-issue basis. Former President Trump is focused on lowering the price of gas. Vice President Harris wants to make housing more affordable. And we saw how President Biden was able to push for lower prices on certain drugs like insulin. Although we should note, of course, that Biden wasn’t able to do that without the help of Congress.
Anna Helhoski:
So Sean, one other thing. Maybe it’s obvious but it’s worth saying, is that while we have pointed to a lot of ways in which a president cannot really control things like pricing, the president is also the leader of his or her respective political party, and that often means that the party and its political leaders will coalesce around these policies, making them more viable.
Sean Pyles:
Yep. We’ve mentioned that the president often has to work with Congress to get bills passed that can fulfill their promises. And members of their party, while they don’t necessarily march in lockstep, they will frequently work with that president to pursue his or her economic agenda. So no, the president can’t wave a magic wand, but if their party also has control in Congress, that makes a world of difference in the ability to make those goals happen.
Anna Helhoski:
And that’s a case for making sure you’re paying attention to what candidates are saying up and down the ballot. The presidential candidates aren’t the only ones to make a difference. Do some research on your congressional candidates, and for that matter, city council and school district, because they all touch public money and that’s your money. It always helps to educate yourself on how they plan to spend it. You can find the latest money news updates in NerdWallet’s financial news hub, which we’ll link to in the show notes, or just search online for NerdWallet financial news.
Sean Pyles:
So Anna, tell us what’s coming up in episode three of the series.
Anna Helhoski:
Well, Sean, next time we’re using a word nobody likes but matters a lot to your finances: taxes. We’ll hear what the current candidates for the highest office in the land want to do with the money that comes out of your paycheck.
Amy Hanauer:
Two-thirds of the cost of making those individual tax cuts permanent would go to the richest fifth of Americans. So to the richest 20% of Americans. So just for a sense of what that will cost, in 2026 alone, that will cost more than $280 billion.
Anna Helhoski:
For now, that’s all we have for this episode. Do you have a money question of your own? Turn to the Nerds and call or text us your questions at 901-730-6373. That’s 901-730-N-E-R-D. You can also email us at [email protected]. And remember, you can follow the show on your favorite podcast app, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and iHeartRadio to automatically download new episodes.
Sean Pyles:
This episode was produced by Tess Vigeland and Anna. I helped with editing. Rick VanderKnyff and Amanda Derengowski helped with fact-checking. Megan Maurer mixed our audio. And a big thank you to NerdWallet’s editors for all their help.
Anna Helhoski:
And here’s our brief disclaimer. We are not financial or investment advisors. This nerdy info is provided for general educational and entertainment purposes and may not apply to your specific circumstances.
Sean Pyles:
And with that said, until next time, turn to the Nerds.
Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days continues today with discounts exclusively for Prime members.
But you don’t have to be on the hunt for every deal, because frankly, who has time? Our Nerds did the research for you by talking to experts and tracking prices on 12 popular products at four major retailers.
Whether you’re shopping for household staples or holiday gifts, consult this Nerdy list of what to buy (and skip) on Prime Big Deal Days.
Best things to buy (or skip) on Prime Big Deal Days
Buy: Past-purchase staples
Don’t let Amazon’s homepage algorithm dictate what you buy. One strategy to cut through clutter: Let your order history lead the way.
Save money by finding deals on the things you already use and know are worth your money. Open your order history and review items you’ve repurchased over the past 30 days, three months or even a year. If you spot a discount on something you need, take advantage and stock up.
Here’s how to “buy again.”
Amazon app: Go to your cart in the mobile app and select the “buy again” tab near the top of the screen.
Desktop: Click on “Returns & Orders” on the top right side of your screen. Then click “Buy Again” to add frequent purchases to your cart.
We’ve seen the “Prime Big Deals” label on trash bags, dog food, dishwasher pods, mouthwash, Clorox cleaner, the Mr. Clean Magic Eraser, vitamins and baby bottles. You can also shop for items that regularly wear out, such as the water filter in your refrigerator or the electric toothbrush heads you’ve been using for too long.
Skip: Lightning deals
Look away from pressure-driven lightning deals that are only available for a limited time or until a certain number of units are sold. These promotions are meant to make you feel panicked and push you toward impulsive purchases.
“Consumers are easily swayed by the deals and promotion messages, and their ‘fear of missing out (FOMO)’ mentality often tricks them into jumping on these flash deals,” Savannah Wei Shi, associate professor of marketing at Santa Clara University, said in an email interview.
Take a breath and know that if you miss the deal, you’re not missing out. The item will probably be discounted in the coming months, which could give you time to realize you don’t even want it anymore.
Buy: Toys
If you need gift ideas for the kids in your life, Andrea Woroch, a personal finance writer and consumer savings expert who has appeared on “Good Morning America” and other TV news shows, recommends looking for deals on crafting kits, dolls and action figures, Lego sets and even video game consoles and gaming bundles.
Woroch warns, however, that not all toy deals will be worth it this early in the holiday shopping season, and suggests going in knowing what you want. How do you know when to add that toy to your cart?
“If you’re getting 30% off, buy it. That’s a good deal,” she says.
Amazon highlighted Lego deals in its Prime Big Deal Days announcement and Target is advertising up to 30% off select sets during its Circle Week sale, which runs all week.
Skip: Small home appliances
You might be better off waiting until Black Friday or Cyber Monday to buy small home appliances. Based on our price tracking data, the Instant Vortex 6-quart 4-in-1 air fryer is on sale for $107.95 today, but if you wait, you could score a bigger deal. The air fryer was $59.49 during Amazon’s Cyber Monday sale last November.
Coffee lovers also might want to hold out for another sale. The Keurig K-Classic single-serve coffee maker we tracked was $109.99 at Amazon during July’s Prime Day Sale and is $139 now. Last year, the price dropped to $76.49 on Cyber Monday, so you’re probably better off waiting. That, or buy it directly from Keurig.com, where it’s $99.99 today.
Buy: Personal electronics
Our advice is nuanced in this category. Discounts on headphones and smart speakers are a given during Amazon’s major sales. The price of the high-end set of Sony headphones we’re tracking is down to $298 at Amazon ($297 at Walmart) — about $100 off list price — which matches the Prime Day in July price.
Many Alexa-enabled devices and Amazon-branded e-readers are also on sale today. Tablets, fitness trackers, streaming sticks, laptops, cameras and TVs are fair game, too. The 65-inch LG C3 TV we’ve been watching dropped to a low of $1,296.99 at Amazon and Walmart for this week’s sales. That’s $300 less than it was on Black Friday 2023.
But the product release cycle impacts gadget prices. For example, if you were hoping to pick up an Apple Watch Series 9 (GPS + Cellular) with a 41mm sport band at a discount after the series 10 was released, you might be out of luck.
With the new version now out, Amazon was only selling a used version of the previous model for $462.56, and it was unavailable at Target in the weeks leading up to Prime Big Deal Days. If you’re not picky about the color or style you purchase, you might be able to score a deal.
Get more financial clarity with NerdWallet
Monitor your credit, track your spending and see all of your finances together in a single place.
Skip: Fast fashion on Amazon
Fashion can be hit or miss on Amazon, Woroch says. If you hold off on clothing purchases today, you can save your money for when there are more sales from a wider selection of storefronts about a month from now.
“I would wait for Black Friday weekend,” she says.
More stores participate, and you’ll have the chance to get great deals from brands known for better clothes, she says.
Are Prime Big Deal Days the best time to buy?
Not always. Amazon has created two sale holidays — Prime Day in July and Prime Big Deal Days in October — that have forced other retailers to follow suit.
Our data shows some deals are worth a look. Discounts from Amazon and its competitors during Prime Big Deal Days make it the best time to buy five of the 12 products on our list. Prime Day in July delivered the lowest price for four items on our list.
So, for nine out of the 12 items we tracked, Prime Day in July or October brought the lowest prices. Last Black Friday had the lowest price for only one of the items on our list and tied with Cyber Monday for another.
Here’s a tidbit that sums up shopping online in 2024: Prices can be just as good, or better, during non-sale days. That was the case for the aforementioned Sony headphones.
If you were shopping on a random Tuesday (Sept. 24 to be exact), you could have nabbed them for $285 from a third-party seller on Walmart.com, $12 less than today. But good prices during off-sale periods are tough to time. Waiting for the big sale is easier.
Check competitors and your budget
The Prime Big Deal Days sale isn’t the only one happening this week. Amazon is probably the play for Prime members (most deals require a Prime membership), but online shopping makes it easy to compare prices at competitors. Target Circle week (Oct. 6-12) and Walmart’s first Holiday Deals Event (Oct. 8-13) are both happening now, and our research shows prices are competitive.
Like with Amazon, Target’s sale is for Circle members only (free to join), while Walmart’s sale is open to everyone (although paid Walmart+ members get early access to special deals). Don’t overlook Best Buy, especially when it comes to electronics.
If you have a holiday shopping budget, now’s the time to revisit it. If money is tight and shopping would put you into debt or cause bills to go unpaid, skip the sale. There will be plenty of chances to buy things you want or need in the future. Some distance will give you a chance to research, reevaluate and save.
How we tracked prices
NerdWallet tracked online prices on 12 products at four nationwide retailers — Amazon, Target, Walmart and Best Buy — focusing on Black Friday 2023, Cyber Monday 2023, Prime Day 2024 and Prime Big Deal Days 2024. We selected a range of items, including electronics and home goods, that are popular with shoppers year after year.
Some caveats:
Some products have upgrades or a new model introduced in a given year. In these cases, we continued to track the original item and not the newest generation.
Pricing can vary based on color. When possible, the most basic and/or universal color was selected. If this color or model wasn’t available, we tracked another color.
In-store and online prices sometimes vary. We used online prices to reflect the current retail landscape, which is defined by dynamic pricing, and to ensure we got the most up-to-date prices available.
Get more financial clarity with NerdWallet
Monitor your credit, track your spending and see all of your finances together in a single place.
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money podcast, where we answer your real-world money questions. In this episode:
Learn what it truly means to work with a certified financial planner (CFP) and how personalized advice can help you set and achieve your financial goals.
What should you know before working with a certified financial planner? What strategies can help you navigate societal pressures and make personal financial choices? Host Sean Pyles talks to Magda Doemeny, a certified financial planner with NerdWallet Advisors, to discuss the power of personalized financial advice and behavioral budgeting to help you understand how to align your financial goals with your personal values. They begin with a discussion of the role of certified financial planners, including the fiduciary responsibility of CFPs, the specialized knowledge they bring to areas like estate planning, and common strategies for cutting through societal noise to focus on personal priorities. They also discuss the innovative concept of behavioral budgeting, which involves creating sustainable financial habits like limiting dining out.
NerdWallet Advisory LLC, dba NerdWallet Advisors, is an SEC-registered investment advisor and wholly owned subsidiary of NerdWallet Inc. The advice provided in this episode of Smart Money was for illustrative purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice specific to your personal facts or circumstances.
Check out this episode on your favorite podcast platform, including:
NerdWallet stories related to this episode:
Auto loans from our partners
Episode transcript
This transcript was generated from podcast audio by an AI tool.
Sean Pyles:
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money Podcast, where you send us your money questions and we answer them with the help of our genius Nerds. I’m Sean Pyles. This episode, we’re going deep into financial planning, what it actually means to work with a financial planner, how working with a planner can improve your finances and why we sometimes have such a hard time changing our financial behaviors.
Over the last few months, we’ve shared a series of conversations between our listeners, a certified financial planner from the NerdWallet Advisors platform and me. In these conversations, our advisor, Magda Doemeny, has given a range of advice to our listeners. Today, we’re going to hear Magda’s philosophy around financial planning, who might benefit from working with a CFP and how people can better their finances on their own. Magda, welcome back to Smart Money.
Magda Doemeny:
Thanks, Sean.
Sean Pyles:
We’ve talked about this before, but give us that refresher. What is NerdWallet Advisors and what is your role there?
Magda Doemeny:
I’m an advisor on the NerdWallet Advisors team and we offer affordable financial planning memberships, which gives you access to a certified financial planner like myself for a low monthly cost. What we’ll do is we’ll go ahead and take a look at your financial situation and come up with a financial plan and give you some bite-sized action items for you to try and accomplish your goals. That will give you unlimited access to myself or your advisor, and we’ll check in periodically, but ultimately you can access us by scheduling a call or sending us a message at any time.
Sean Pyles:
All right, so let’s start with financial planning 101. What does it mean to be a certified financial planner? What is the financial planning process like? Give our listeners the intel.
Magda Doemeny:
The financial planning process is diverse, just like everyone’s financial situation is diverse. And so ultimately, the high-level process starts with understanding somebody’s current financial picture and their goals. You can have two people who have the exact same financial makeup and different goals and they would have wildly different advice given to them, because there are some people who want to spend the last penny on the day they die. And there are some people who want to accumulate so much wealth, they can pass it on for generations.
And so the advice you might give to somebody would look very different from that perspective. But really, what you’re trying to do is figure out what somebody is trying to accomplish with their money, whether it’s pay down debt, purchase something large like a home or a car, or make sure they can retire at a certain age, and then help them come up with the right ways to accomplish that via savings vehicles or investment vehicles or certain types of accounts that might work better for their situation.
Sean Pyles:
What sort of information do you need to take in from a client before you can really understand what they’re working with financially and how you might be able to help them?
Magda Doemeny:
The most basic part that you want to take in is their current financial picture. Probably pretty straightforward, but all of their assets. So how much money they have today and what types of accounts it’s in, how much money they’re making, if anything, and any debts that they may have, whether it’s credit card or mortgage. We want to get that full picture, but we also want to know their personal situation. We want to know if they’re married, if they have children, if they’re divorced, do they have grandchildren? And then we also want to know again, those goals related to those types of things.
So it’s a pretty robust introductory process when you’re going through this, whether it’s for the first time or just with somebody new because it’s important that we understand your full picture. And the other important aspect of this I find with many people, especially those who maybe have debt, is really understanding what money means to them and how they think about money, because that may impact how we suggest doing certain types of financial planning.
Sean Pyles:
A lot of quantitative hard numbers like what’s your budget look like? Are you saving for retirement? And then the qualitative stuff, what do you feel about money? What do you want from your money?
Magda Doemeny:
Exactly. A perfect example is that for an emergency fund, traditionally on paper we would say if you have a dual-income household, which means there are two people in your household that are earning an income, you only need three months worth of expenses in a high-yield savings account for an emergency. Why? Because the likelihood of both of you losing your job at the exact same time is fairly unlikely. And so that three months of expenses plus the secondary salary should be enough to get you through getting a job again.
However, you can sit down next to somebody who says they’re very anxious about money, they’re worried they’re going to run out of it, and they are just hoarding as much cash as they possibly can. Now while I don’t want them to have that much cash and I might tell them that we should do something with it, I might suggest they have six months worth of expenses because I know that getting three months would just cause too much anxiety and that’s not worth it.
Sean Pyles:
Okay. Now let’s talk a bit about what it means to be a certified financial planner. We talk about CFPs a lot in the personal finance space. I’ve been going through the education process to get my CFP certification, so I know a lot about this, but some people may wonder what’s the big deal? So Magda, what’s the big deal?
Magda Doemeny:
The biggest deal is that we have an obligation as fiduciaries to do right by the client.
Sean Pyles:
Fiduciary, meaning you put their interest first.
Magda Doemeny:
That’s exactly right. So we’re not intended to sell them a product or give them something that isn’t in their best interest. So that’s really important. The secondary is that we’ve gone through the training to understand the intricacies of the financial system.
The value you can find here is you can get a broad, a CFP that has a broad range of information and you can get folks who specialize in certain areas that might be niche. That can be really helpful because you know that that person has spent a good amount of their career deep diving into a specific area like maybe estate planning or something like that.
Sean Pyles:
And CFPs can also connect you with people in the state attorney to help you draft those documents. They’re really your one-stop shop for other things in the financial world, getting your estate plan set up, finding insurance that you need, et cetera.
Magda Doemeny:
Exactly. It’s another thing on the list that’s important to us is telling you what we don’t know. So it’s important that we always say, “This is outside of my scope of work, but happy to point you in the right direction of where you could get that piece of your financial picture taken care of.”
Sean Pyles:
So thinking back over your 10-plus years of being a financial planner, what do you think makes the difference between someone who is able to really benefit from your relationship, what a financial planner brings to their life, and someone who doesn’t really have a successful relationship with a financial planner, you or someone else?
Magda Doemeny:
I do think to start, it’s really important that for better or worse you jive with your financial planner. You need to make sure, kind of like a therapist, that when they’re speaking, you’re listening and they need to know that. This isn’t all about dollars and cents. Like we talked about, part of it is emotional. Money can bring out emotions in people, so you want to make sure that you are able to communicate well with your financial planner. Outside of that, I think the other really important aspect of being successful is making sure that you can commit to the process that is set forth.
A lot of financial planners are creating a plan in some capacity. The plans can look different, some can be long, some can be short and one might work better for you than the other. But when they set forth the plan, the intention is to try to take those actions and then check in regularly, whether it’s every three to six months or so to make sure that the plan can get adjusted, because life happens and things change. You may change jobs or get a pay raise or get married or what have you. And all those things impact how you might think about your finances.
Sean Pyles:
I think people may underestimate the amount of work that they have to do when it comes to working with a financial planner. They might want a planner to do all of these things for them. But I, much like therapy, see the need to actually enact uncomfortable change sometimes to get what you want out of your finances. And that can be hard for people to grapple with. But I do want to talk about some through lines in the conversations that we had with our listeners over the past few weeks. One thing that stood out to me really is how similar financial planning is to therapy.
As a somewhat broad generalization, I’ve noticed two main camps of people who go to therapy. I say as someone who’s been to therapy myself, there are clients who want a therapist just to give them permission to do what they want and justify their emotions and behaviors. And there are maybe also in the other camp clients who want to be directed and given guidance around how to change. I did see that in our conversations with listeners. Some people wanted guidance, others just wanted your stamp of approval. Is that common in financial planning relationships?
Magda Doemeny:
I do think it’s common depending on their situations. The idea of stamp of approval, those tend to be folks who are maybe underspenders and they’re sometimes so knowledgeable about their finances that it’s a hindrance to their personal life. And so they may want you to say, “Hey, loosen up a little bit. It’s okay. You can afford that thing.”
Sean Pyles:
Right. It’s like our conversation with Sean who had over a million dollars in assets and was afraid to really use it to enjoy his life.
Magda Doemeny:
Exactly, exactly. Then there are other folks who come looking for guidance, whether or not they actually, they might actually be looking for you to tell them it’s okay. And the hardest part, but also the most gratifying part of our job is being able to, in this gentlest way possible, tell them that they do have to stop doing that thing or maybe they can’t accomplish the goal the way they thought they wanted to accomplish the goal and we do need to actually change the behaviors. And so whether or not those folks are always open to coming in wanting a stamp of approval and not getting it is one thing.
But I do think making sure that you can take somebody who wants a stamp of approval and change them into somebody who can take action is really empowering and a really fun part of the job. But there are definitely people who come in here in this planning process ready to make a change. They just don’t know what to do. And that’s amazing, because their eyes are open. They’re looking for not the answers, because we’re not going to give you the answers, but looking for the structure to be able to start to make good or different financial decisions.
Sean Pyles:
They’re open to change, which is a huge thing.
Magda Doemeny:
Sean Pyles:
What you were just saying reminds me of our listener, Jim from Milwaukee, who is interested in cashing out his retirement account to move to San Diego. He seemed to want that stamp of approval from you, and you and I were both kind of turned off by the idea about him cashing out his retirement. And so you did have to do a really careful pivot of what his financial goals were and say, “Hey, how can you make some more money where you are now and fund that move in a less risky way?” So that’s an interesting part of financial planning too. It’s about exploring alternative ways to get to where they want to go. Because there are so many options available to people and they may not really even realize that.
Magda Doemeny:
I do think a lot of it is about being creative and meeting them where they are. You do have to recognize maybe where your living situation is could impact their ability to execute on something that we’re suggesting. I might say, “Hey, your rent is too high.” And they may say, “Yep, that’s as cheap as it’s going to get here.” And so you have to find a way to, is there something else we can do to have the same result, which is increase your overall savings.
Sean Pyles:
Another common theme in our conversations was the idea of external pressure that people feel about the things that they quote should be doing with their money. One listener knew that she was spending too much on discretionary purchases, but felt like it was what she should be doing to have a certain lifestyle, even though it was causing trouble for her financially.
And she could fully acknowledge that, which was so fascinating to see. How can people cut through the noise and the shoulds and find out what they really want from their money and make sure that it’s a goal that they personally truly care about, not what other people expect of them?
Magda Doemeny:
It’s hard. I think in the environment that we have today with easy ways to spend your money and seeing easy ways to know how much everyone else has and/or not has, but how they spend their money doesn’t mean they have it, I do think that is a very big challenge for a lot of people. But I think giving yourself the space a couple of times a year, maybe every six months, you could call it new and you can call it over summer. It’s something you can work with a financial planner on to sit down and really ask those questions. What are you trying to accomplish?
Because I’ve noticed when folks come in here, they have these goals, but when you sit down and you ask them, does that thing that you bought or that thing that you said you wanted, is it more important than your retirement? Most of the time, they say no. Right? And so working with somebody to help you put your goals into context can be really helpful.
But I do think it’s hard to do that alone, but you should spend every six months or at least every year thinking about, “Okay, what’s changed in my life? What are the things that I’m trying to accomplish? Do I want to get married now? Has that changed from the year before? Do I want to buy a house?” I have folks all the time say they’ve been wanting to buy a house for years, and all of a sudden they said, “You know what? I don’t want to do that anymore.”
And that’s great. If that’s the decision that you’ve come to, we can adjust your finances to move, shift your money to do something different, travel more expensively now. So I think it’s tough, but-
Sean Pyles:
I think having the dialogue with a financial planner can be really helpful, especially in the beginning because I try to keep a running almost meta-narrative of my financial decisions where I ask myself, why did I do that? Why did I buy whatever? Why did I want to go on this specific trip? Why am I saving so much for retirement when all my friends are like the world’s burning? Why bother? And getting really clear on what it means for me to be making these decisions helps me feel more confident that I’m doing the right thing for myself. But it’s hard to get to that place of having that sort of higher level conversation without some guidance, at least initially.
Magda Doemeny:
Yeah, and I do think it’s really important to not spend too much of your time comparing yourself directly to the people, whether you know them or not, because what you don’t know is what’s behind the curtain. Somebody could be living a very lavish lifestyle and be in debt up to their eyebrows, and you would have no idea. That’s not how it looks, but that could be the reality.
And so I think that’s why it’s so important to talk to somebody about it, because we can pull you out of that world and look at your world and where your income is and where your expenses are, and ask you what lifestyle you truly want to lead and figure out how we can bridge the gap between all of those things.
Sean Pyles:
All right. Well, I want to go a little bit deeper into your personal financial philosophy. From our conversations, I know that you’re really into what you call behavioral budgeting. Can you describe what that is for us?
Magda Doemeny:
Behavioral budgeting is something that’s done in conjunction with exact budgeting or traditional budgeting, as you may have it. Traditional budgeting is putting down all your expenses with the dollar amounts and setting a goal that is dollar-based. You only want to spend $500 a month eating out. That type of budgeting is really important because you do need to know the dollars in and dollars out. But I have found that sometimes if you don’t incorporate behavioral budgeting in addition to that, you tend to fall off after a period of time, because it can be a lot of work to pay attention to every dollar that’s coming in and out every month for the rest of your life. Even just saying that out loud seems daunting.
So instead, I found that behavioral budgeting can help in that you can actually create a behavior in your life that could be more permanent and acts as a budgeting tool. That would be something like you only eat out twice a week. I’m not putting a restriction on the dollar amount that you can purchase when you eat out, but I’m taking somebody whose lifestyle was three or four or who knows, and asking them to check every week that they pick just two days. It’s a short timeline.
It’s usually a lot of the behavioral goals are weekly, so you can do it in your head. You don’t need a tool, you don’t need to write it down. You can say by Sunday or Monday, I did it or I didn’t do it. And it will naturally bring down how much you’re spending, and in theory, can be permanent. You get in the habit in order to execute on dining out only twice a week. It’s not just, “Oh, I can do that.” You actually have to learn how to plan. So every Sunday, you have to figure out what you want to eat for the week.
You have to make your grocery list, you have to go to the store, and maybe you have to do some meal prep, because if you don’t do those things, you will end up eating out more than twice a week. And so eventually, it becomes a habit. Sundays are my, do not bother me from three to five P.M. because I’m executing on my plan for the week.
Sean Pyles:
I think habit is such a key word here. You have to build up the routine of doing certain things in a certain way and being more intentional about it, especially in the beginning.
Magda Doemeny:
Absolutely.
Sean Pyles:
Okay, so Magda, as you know, despite many people’s best efforts, folks can really struggle to change their financial behaviors, like overspending or not setting aside money for retirement. What do you think it really takes to change financial behaviors?
Magda Doemeny:
I do think it does take a level of, I don’t know if discipline is the right word, motivation might be it. It’s not too dissimilar from other types of goals that I think many people can relate to, whether it’s health and nutrition goals. You’re thinking you’re not healthy, so you commit to finally going to the doctor for them to decide what is it? Or you buy a gym membership or you start working with a nutritionist.
All of those are the first steps in the process, but if you’re not able to actually be determined enough to learn and execute on the step-by-step of that process, which is for the gym, you got to come every three days and you got to do these workouts or the doctor’s going to say, “Okay, well, we need you to start eating these types of foods and we need you to adjust this,” and you have to actually execute on that. Your finances are the same thing, right? Coming to a financial planner helps be the person that tells you, here are some of the next steps you need to take.
But you do have to come into it with a mentality that it might not be easy, right? It’s not you’re going to come in here and somebody’s going to say, “Just do these two things. They’re all ten-minute exercises and voila, you’re a millionaire.” It’s not like that. It’s a slowly, but surely, you’re learning more about your finances, you are learning some techniques of things you can do differently, and you’re checking in somewhat regularly to make sure that we’re still on track for those things. And so I do think the fix it quickly is just not the mentality that you can have to be successful.
Sean Pyles:
Yeah. Have realistic expectations about what it means to change.
Magda Doemeny:
Sean Pyles:
And why you’re changing.
Magda Doemeny:
Sean Pyles:
Okay. Well, I want to talk about who might not need to work with a financial planner, because as we know, CFPs typically outside of platforms like NerdWallet Advisors can be quite expensive to work with. So who do you think is fine doing it on their own, maybe working with a financial coach or someone else?
Magda Doemeny:
I do think that it will depend on what they’re looking for. CFPs, in particular, do specialize in looking at very specific aspects of financial planning. And so I do think that folks who might be in very severe debt could benefit from working with a financial coach first. That could be somebody who is helping them just really hone in on their budget and potentially looking at some alternatives to their debt management, like credit counseling or something like that.
But I do think that it’s all, in general, access to a financial planner is usually cost prohibitive, which is what’s so great about NerdWallet Advisors is that it’s a low monthly fee, and so it does give you access to, gives financial planning access to the masses really. And I do think that there are some folks who might want something a little bit more robust on investing their assets and so that, you would want to have an investment manager look at your assets.
Sean Pyles:
Okay. Well, Magda, if you could give one piece of advice, and only one, to our listeners, what would that be?
Magda Doemeny:
I think it would be to give yourself a break from the exhaustion of trying to be perfect as it relates to your finances, but also not to give up on finding a path to success for yourself. Whatever that first step might be, whether that’s reaching out to a financial planner or at minimum, getting your expenses in order so you can really look at it in the mirror and figure out where your spending is, I think you should take that next step.
Sean Pyles:
Give yourself some grace, do the work.
Magda Doemeny:
Sean Pyles:
Great. Well, Magda Doemeny from NerdWallet Advisors, thank you so much for talking with me.
Magda Doemeny:
Thank you.
Sean Pyles:
And that’s all we have for this episode. Remember, listener, that we are here to answer your money questions. So turn to the Nerds and call or text us your questions at 901-730-6373. That’s 901-730-N-E-R-D. You can also email us at [email protected]. Also, visit nerdwallet.com/podcast for more info on this episode. And remember that you can follow the show on your favorite podcast app, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and iHeartRadio, to automatically download new episodes.
Here’s our brief disclaimer. I am not a financial or investment advisor. This nerdy info is provided for general educational and entertainment purposes and may not apply to your specific circumstances.
This episode was produced by Tess Vigeland and myself. A special thanks to Magda Doemeny, Georgia McIntyre, and Emily Canedo. And a big thank you to NerdWallet’s editors for all their help. And with that said, until next time, turn to the Nerds.
NerdWallet Advisory LLC, dba NerdWallet Advisors, is an SEC-registered investment advisor, and wholly owned subsidiary of NerdWallet, Inc. The advice provided in this episode of Smart Money was for illustrative purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice specific to your personal facts or circumstances.
The closest I got to Halloween as a child was through classic movies like “Hocus Pocus” and “Casper.” That’s because I grew up in a religious household that chose not to celebrate Halloween.
Since I didn’t embark on the adventure of costume wearing as a child, it’s become a first-generation tradition in my household. Although fun, my third year in, I’m realizing how expensive this costume business can become.
Americans are expected to spend about $104 on Halloween this year, according to the National Retail Federation. If you’ll be participating in spooky season festivities, keep reading for a few mom-approved tips for how to save on costumes.
Set a budget to avoid spooky spending
If you’re anything like me, when it comes to spending on creative ventures, you become a kid in a candy store. However, splurging on a Halloween costume can be counterproductive to your financial goals.
Karen Heffren, a mom from Tucson, Arizona, and owner of the DIY blog Desert Chica, says she’s always been frugal, and that’s no different on Halloween.
“When it came to costumes, I didn’t want to spend $25 on a costume that wasn’t great and my kid would wear for an hour,” she says.
Consider setting a hard limit on how much you’ll spend. If you’re unsure how to calculate what you can afford this year, remember your costume money should ideally come from your discretionary income. That’s what’s left after you meet all of your core financial needs.
If you use the 50/30/20 budgeting system, costume money should come out of your 30% wants category, while 50% goes to needs and 20% to debt and savings.
Push your creative boundaries with a DIY costume
You’d be surprised how much you can save by making a Halloween costume using items around the house. Heffren was first inspired to DIY Halloween costumes about 17 years ago when her family became a single-income household. She shares DIY costume ideas on her blog to help people who may need inspiration and says you don’t have to be a super crafter to use this option.
“You just have to be able to think about what skills you have, and then just modify your ideas to make it work,” she says.
Inspired by my research and interviews for this article, I plan to be Whitney Houston this year and have all the items I need at home already. I’ll use a black leather jacket, big hair, red lipstick, a white shirt and leggings. There are multiple resources you can consult for DIY costume research, such as Pinterest, YouTube, Instagram, blogs and TikTok.
It’s also important to keep track of your DIY costume spending along the way so it doesn’t end up costing significantly more than a ready-made costume. If it does cost more, the extra expense may be worthwhile if the costume can be repurposed, which we’ll discuss more below.
Choose costumes that can be repurposed
Kalia Johnson, a content creator and mother in Dallas, made a grape costume for her son last year, and it’s the gift that keeps on giving because most of the items are still functional. The inspiration for the costume came from her son playfully putting balls from his ball pit into his onesie.
“The reason why I like this costume is because we still use all the items that we used for the costume,” she says. “He still uses ball pit balls. He still uses the bamboo sleeper as pajamas. He still uses the beanie if it [is] cold outside.”
The only items Johnson bought were the leaves she used, and they cost a couple of bucks.
Heffren, too, is a firm believer in using items that can be repurposed. She uses hoodies as an example.
One of her most memorable costumes was Olaf from the movie “Frozen,” and she used a hoodie and felt fabric to make it. Another example? Heffren says you can use a white button-down shirt, cardboard, an angry face printout, black slacks and some felt material to create the Anger character from the “Inside Out” movies.
Heffren recommends using duct tape or sewing items onto the costume base so you can easily repurpose it or fix mistakes. I plan to take this advice and use a hoodie and felt material to build my son’s Sonic costume this year.
Consider using pre-loved items
Using secondhand items for a Halloween costume is another way to save money.
Some places where you can buy a used costume or items for a DIY piece include Facebook Marketplace, eBay, OfferUp or your local thrift store. Keep in mind that one of the challenges with getting a ready-made costume may be finding one that you like and that comes in your size. If you want to coordinate costumes with loved ones, going this route could be difficult.
Heffren says people should remember that costumes don’t have to be perfect. That means you don’t have to coordinate your entire family’s costumes, nor do you need to turn costumes into a grand and expensive DIY project.
“I think you just have to set realistic expectations and it’s just for fun, you know? It’s not Picasso, right?”
Economic topics took center stage in the vice presidential debate Tuesday night between Ohio Sen. JD Vance and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. The candidates defended their tickets while debating intensely on inflation, housing, child care and health care.
The debate, held in New York City and hosted by CBS, gave Walz and Vance the opportunity to more clearly define themselves to voters, as both were thrust quickly into the national stage this summer. In contrast to the presidential debate three weeks ago between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, the vice presidential debate was strongly focused on policy.
Also unlike the first debate between Trump and Harris, the Walz-Vance debate remained civil and sometimes agreeable. The pair even found common ground in the fact that both have made public misstatements in the past — Vance in his prior condemnation of Trump and Walz incorrectly stating that he had been in Hong Kong during the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
But it was still a debate between candidates with stark conflicting views on most issues, especially abortion and immigration. They used their time to attack the others’ rivals at the top of the ticket. The biggest moment of tension between the two men came when Walz confronted Vance about whether he believed that Trump lost the 2020 election — Vance bypassed the question and instead pivoted to a claim about pandemic-related censorship on Facebook.
As Walz and Vance supported their respective running mates, here’s what they had to say on some key economic issues:
The economy
Vance said Harris has already had the time to enact her policy plans, some of which he said “even sounds pretty good”: “If Kamala Harris has such great plans for how to address middle-class problems, then she ought to do them now.”
Walz attacked Trump for his contributions to the state of the economy the Biden-Harris administration inherited. He said: “We were already, before Covid, in a manufacturing recession — about 10 million people out of work, largest percentage since the Great Depression.”
Walz also gave his appeal to voters when it comes to Trump’s tax policies: “How is it fair that you’re paying your taxes every year and Donald Trump hasn’t paid any federal tax in the last 15 years?”
Housing affordability
Harris wants to increase housing production and encourage first-time home buying through downpayment support. Walz supported Harris’ plans and attacked Trump’s plan to seize federal lands
Trump wants to make housing more affordable by seizing federal lands, providing tax incentives and deporting immigrants. Trump has stated many times that migrants have driven up competition and increased housing prices — this claim is false, but Vance said he would share evidence after the debate via social media. Vance said that one of the strategies for lowering housing costs (in addition to Trump’s plan to deport migrants) would be lowering energy prices.
The VP candidates did agree on one thing, sort of. Walz said “The problem we’ve had is that we’ve got a lot of folks that see housing as another commodity.” Vance also said “We should get out of this idea of housing as a commodity,” before returning to more rhetoric related to immigration.
Health care
Vance promised to cover preexisting conditions if Trump is elected.
Walz spoke about Trump’s opposition to the Affordable Care Act and his attempts to repeal it during his time in office.
On abortion, Vance rebuffed the conjecture that he supported a national ban on abortion, although he did support a bill that would have done just that in 2022. He added that he wants the Republican Party to be pro-family: “I want us to support fertility treatments. I want us to make it easier for moms to afford to have babies.”
Meanwhile, Walz fiercely denied Trump’s accusation that he supports abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy.
Child care
Vance claimed that Trump’s plan to levy a 10% tariff on all foreign imports (with up to 60% for Chinese imports and 100% for vehicle imports from Mexico) would bring in money that would help bring down child care costs. Walz disagreed and said the tariffs would raise prices, which has been backed up by economists from all over the spectrum, including the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
Walz said Harris would make a paid family leave a priority. “A federal program of paid family medical leave and help with this will enhance our workforce, enhance our families and make it easier to have the children that you want.” Vance said there is a bipartisan solution to child care.
There are no additional debates scheduled for either the presidential or vice presidential candidates.
By midnight on the East Coast, the Polymarket, a prediction market platform, projected a 65% chance that upcoming polls will show Vance won the debate.
Short for “you need a budget,” YNAB is a budgeting app that uses the zero-based budgeting system to help you make a plan for every dollar of your monthly income. The budgeting process is involved, but YNAB’s website offers articles and videos to help users get with the program.
YNAB is a popular app with thousands of reviews and high user ratings (4.8 on the App Store and 4.7 on Google Play). The r/ynab subreddit has 193,000 members. We downloaded and tested the iOS app and used the web-based version of YNAB to find out how it works and who could benefit from it.
What is YNAB?
More than an app, YNAB is a hands-on money management method based on the following four rules:
Give every dollar a job. This is zero-based budgeting in a nutshell. You make a plan for how you’re going to use each dollar of your income. An old-school way to do this is to put cash in envelopes marked for specific expenses.
Embrace your true expenses. The idea is to take larger, less frequent expenses (like an upcoming vacation) and break them into smaller chunks so you can budget for them each month.
Roll with the punches. This rule encourages flexibility; if you’re struggling to pay a bill one month, you can look for other areas to pull back.
Age your money. This rule emphasizes watching your spending so you can build savings and increase the time between when you earn money and when you spend it.
It’s hard to argue with the philosophy. These are sound rules that promote better financial habits.
Before you build a budget
NerdWallet breaks down your spending and shows you ways to save.
How much does YNAB cost?
YNAB is a paid budgeting app with no free version, although new users can start with a free trial for 34 days. After that, it costs $14.99 per month or $109 per year. College students get YNAB free for a year.
YNAB may be worth the cost if it helps you spend less and save more money over time.
How does YNAB work?
YNAB is not a set-it-and-forget-it budgeting app. Rather, it encourages you to play an active role in managing your money by defining budgeting categories, allocating money to those categories and then closely monitoring transactions as they occur.
Define expense categories
Initial setup is the most tedious part, but YNAB asks a few questions up front — about debt and what you like to spend money on — to help you define spending categories. Think of these spending categories as line items in a budgeting spreadsheet (like rent, groceries and meals out), but with a fancier design.
It’s important to include every spending category you can think of in your YNAB budget, and you may need to consult bill receipts, credit card transactions and bank statements at first. Don’t forget to add categories for debt payments, saving and investing if applicable.
🤓Nerdy Tip
Do yourself a favor and use YNAB’s desktop site on a laptop to set up your budget. The larger layout makes it easy to be thorough when defining and organizing spending categories.
Complete the setup process by setting spending targets for recurring expenses — like a monthly rent payment that remains relatively constant at $1,500 per month — and add your current bank balance. You can connect your bank or add the balance manually.
Fund expenses (only with money you have)
YNAB wants you to be intentional and honest with yourself about your money, which means only assigning money you have to your budgeting categories. Your bank balance displays at the top of the app and goes down as you allocate funds to each expense category.
YNAB doesn’t restrict you from funding categories with money not yet there (for example, the second paycheck you know is coming later in the month), but you’ll see a negative balance in bright red that shows you’ve assigned more than you have. Here’s how one user put it on a r/YNAB Reddit thread:
“Imagine you have actual cash and you’re trying to put it in envelopes. The red bubble is there because you’re trying to put cash you don’t have yet in the envelopes,” wrote u/HLef in response to a question from a YNAB newbie who was seeing red.
Record and categorize transactions
Funding your expense categories is the planning part of YNAB. Recording transactions is how you monitor actual spending. The hands-on nature of YNAB means you’ll need to record and categorize transactions for a real-time look at how actual spending aligns with how much you’ve allocated to each category. You can manually enter every purchase yourself, or link supported bank and credit card accounts within the app to make importing transactions more automatic.
YNAB is likely to work best when you’re faithful about funding categories and recording transactions in the app.
What are the pros and cons of YNAB?
The big benefit of YNAB — its super hands-on approach that encourages saving — may be a drawback that keeps others away. Also, it costs money.
Pros
YNAB is a sound money management philosophy within an app.
The app is well-designed and also accessible on desktop.
There are lots of resources available to help you learn the YNAB way.
Cons
This money management method is really involved, which may make it hard to stick with it.
It’s pricey and there is no free version; at $14.99 per month, you’ll spend nearly $900 in five years (or $545 at $109 per year).
What are some YNAB alternatives?
Budgeting apps are all the rage, and there’s no shortage of options to choose from in 2024.
EveryDollar is an app (like YNAB) that makes our best budget apps list and offers a zero-based budgeting framework. Some users may find it simpler to manage than YNAB. EveryDollar has a free and paid version.
PocketGuard is an alternative that’s big on simplifying the budgeting process. Essentially, you can link your bank accounts, credit cards, loans and investments, plus use the app to track net worth and monitor spending. PocketGuard also has a free and paid version.
Who is YNAB for?
YNAB may be for you if you’re serious about optimizing your finances and have the discipline to stick with it. To be effective and get your money’s worth, you’ll need to be in the app adjusting your categories, forecasting where your funds will go and recording transactions on a regular basis. If you can do that, you’ll probably be better with money for it.
Methodology
We chose to review this app because of its popularity and high ratings in both major app stores. We signed up for the free trial and conducted hands-on testing using both the desktop and mobile app versions of YNAB to understand the budgeting process and explore key features.
Before you build a budget
NerdWallet breaks down your spending and shows you ways to save.
You’ve heard a lot of campaign promises this election cycle, but the ones most directly impact your finances are tax cuts and credits.
Expand the Child Tax Credit.
Tax the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
Expand the tax deduction for new small businesses.
Expand the earned income tax credit.
Expand and make permanent the tax credit enhancements for Affordable Care Act plans.
Tax cuts that incentivize home builders to build affordable homes.
Extend the soon-to-expire 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
End taxes on overtime and Social Security.
Applying across-the-board tariffs on all foreign imports; 60% on China; and 100% tariffs on cars made in Mexico.
Lower the corporate tax rate by one point to 20%. In his first term, he cut corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%.
Implement R&D tax credits for businesses in their first year — a reversal of his policy in the 2017 tax cuts.
Replace income taxes with his new import tariffs.
The undercurrent during the election is the looming expiration of 2017 tax cuts at the end of 2025. Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst with the Tax Foundation (a nonpartisan think tank), says the uncertainty of the future of those cuts is a big problem for both candidates.
“It would be a win to get some stability and certainty back into the tax code there, to get the permanence, even if it’s not necessarily what everyone wants, that would be a win,” says Watson. “The fact that we are seeing interest on the Hill for both candidates to do that would be a win. But I mean, that does really require more detail on how that might work.”
As far as how the candidates are tackling all aspects of tax code, Amy Hanauer, executive director of the left-leaning think tank Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, says, “The big picture is the Harris approach raises more revenue; it raises it primarily from the wealthiest and corporations. The Trump approach puts us deeper in debt and gives a lot more away to wealthy people and corporations. Both of them, I think, have some proposals that would help middle class families on the tax side. But the Harris approach gives us more revenue to pay for things that middle class families might want.”
Most, if not all, of the candidates’ proposals would have to go through Congress before being enacted. The executive branch technically has the “power to tax,” but presidents rarely exercise that authority. Typically, the president will ask Congress to create and pass tax policies. With a divided Congress, it’s unclear what might have bipartisan appeal.
How would Trump and Harris’ tax plans affect the economy?
It’s highly unlikely that every tax proposal a candidate makes on the campaign trail will see the light of day. Nevertheless, available projections show what the anticipated outcome would be if all of the candidates’ proposals were adopted.
An analysis of both candidates’ tax plans by the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School projects that Harris’ tax proposals would increase primary budget deficits by more than $1.2 trillion on net from 2025 to 2034. Trump’s tax proposals would increase deficits by $5.8 trillion over the same 10-year period.
Nerd out on investing news
A NerdWallet account is the smartest way to see the latest financial news and what it means for your wallet.
On the whole, an analysis by the Tax Foundation says Harris’ plans would raise nearly $1.7 trillion in revenue over 10 years. During that time period GDP is projected to decline by 2%; wages would decline by 1.2%; and the equivalent of 786,000 full-time jobs would be lost.
The Tax Foundation says that Trump’s tax plans would lose revenue by $1.325 trillion over 10 years; GDP would decline by 0.2%; wages would increase 0.6%; and the equivalent of 387,000 full-time jobs would be lost.
Watson says it’s still unclear how Harris raises enough revenue to offset her tax cut plans, especially if she extends the 2017 tax cuts (her stance is not yet known). “Something that is easy to say is, ‘We’ll just cut all this money from high earners. Most Americans don’t pay a dime and we’ll get this all covered.’ That might be true on some margin, depending on how that works out.”
He adds, “It would be good to know what those offsets might look like so that we can figure out what their total fiscal costs would be, and what the actual tradeoffs are for Americans.”
As for Trump, Hanauer says, “He’s kind of looking to just intensify his previous approach, which is expensive tax cuts that definitely add to the deficit and the debt. And then tax cuts that go primarily to wealthy people and corporations,” she says. “He’s floated some other things and his vice presidential candidate has floated some other things. But in terms of concrete things, on paper, it’s a little bit more of the same.”
Tax plans: Harris vs. Trump
Here are some of the major tax changes that the candidates promise to deliver.
Individual income taxes and credits
Harris has pledged several taxes that would fall on the wealthiest Americans including increasing the net investment income tax up to 5% on those with incomes above $400,000 and increasing the highest tax rate on long-term capital gains to 28% on taxable income above $1 million. The Committee for a Responsible Budget, a nonpartisan think tank, estimates that the revenue from Harris’ taxes on the wealthy would be $900 billion over the period between fiscal year 2026 to fiscal year 2035.
For families, she also promises to expand the child tax credit: $6,000 for children under the age of 1; $3,600 for children ages 2-5; and $3,000 for older children. Hanuer says child tax credits are a big win for all families, especially for children being raised in poverty. “We know that that’s just a crucial time of life when kids will be better off for the rest of their lives if they’re raised in lower poverty,” she adds.
Additional policies include:
Permanently extend expanded premium tax credits.
No tax on tips.
Make expiring individual income tax cuts permanent.
Restore the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction that allows taxpayers to reduce their federally taxable income by itemizing certain local and state taxes. It would be a reversal of Trump’s past position, since he was responsible for capping the deduction at $10,000.
No tax on overtime work. The Tax Foundation says the proposal is missing key details, but would reduce revenue. It would also likely change decisions that both employers and employees make about overtime.
No tax on tips.
Consider replacing the personal income tax with increased tariffs. Trump has proposed 10% to 20% tariffs applied across-the-board and 60% for China. See more on the potential impacts of his tariffs below.
Trump’s vice presidential pick JD Vance said he supports increasing the child tax credit to $5,000. On the campaign trail, Trump said parents of newborns would be able to deduct “major” expenses, but did not elaborate on what that entailed.
How Harris and Trump want to battle inflation and lower prices
Both presidential candidates are promising to give people what they want: to pay less money for most everything.
But whether Trump or Harris are capable of lowering prices is debatable. Experts say presidents aren’t usually the primary drivers of inflation in the economy; monetary policy has a much greater impact, as do fluctuations in the supply chain and good old-fashioned consumer demand. Read more about the candidates’ plans to lower prices.
Medicare and Social Security taxes
Harris has said she supports a Biden-proposed measure that would increase the Medicare tax from 3.8% to 5% on those with incomes above $400,000. This additional Medicare tax is only paid by high-income earners. Revenue is used to fund Medicare. The Tax Foundation estimates it would lead to a slight reduction in GDP, wages and full-time jobs. Watson says that adopting the 5% surtax for Medicare would help the Medicare trust fund’s solvency, at least “a bit,” but doesn’t address the Social Security side.
Trump, meanwhile, has floated eliminating the income tax on Social Security benefits altogether. Hanauer says Trump’s proposal would lower taxes by $550 on average, per household, but at the expense of the Social Security fund.
Social Security is taxed differently than other income. Currently, those who withdraw Social Security benefits must pay taxes on 50%-80% of their benefits, depending on income. Any income tax revenue from taxed income above a threshold amount ($25,000 for an individual or $32,000 for a married couple filing jointly) goes into the Social Security trust fund, which keeps the program running. But the Tax Foundation says that if Social Security is no longer taxed, it would reduce revenue going to Medicare and Social Security trust funds, which could speed up the funds’ insolvency.
The Social Security Administration projects that the combined trust funds are expected to run out as of 2035. Watson says, “Trump trying to exempt security income from tax puts us in exactly the wrong direction.” He adds that Harris’ lack of a detailed plan for Social Security presents a challenge as the U.S. inches closer to the trust funds being exhausted.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a major revamp of the individual income and estate tax codes made under the Trump administration, is set to expire after 2025. The deadline means that whoever is elected will need to make a decision on what to do with the existing provisions. Trump has endorsed extending expiring provisions, while Harris has not been clear about what she would do.
During the campaign, Trump has said he would:
Make expiring individual income tax cuts permanent.
Consider replacing personal income taxes with tariffs.
The expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act delivered large tax cuts to those in the top 1% of earners — those earning above $800,000 a year. Hanauer says making the cuts permanent would “cut into revenue that could otherwise maybe be providing those larger child tax credits for middle income Americans and poor Americans, or that could be being used to reduce the national debt or to fund something new like child care or health care or infrastructure.”
The Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the think tanks Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, projected in 2017 that Trump tax cuts would most benefit the most wealthy. The Tax Policy Center’s models in 2017 showed that households with income in the top 1% are projected to receive a more than $60,000 tax cut in 2025 while households in the bottom 60% are expected to receive less than $500.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said in a June 13 analysis, that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did not deliver the economic benefits that Trump promised. Among those promises was a claim that the corporate tax rate cut would boost household income by $4,000. The CBPP points to research showing that workers who earned less than $114,000 on average in 2016 didn’t see changes to their earnings, while high salaried workers saw increases.
Business taxes
Increase the corporate income tax rate from the current rate of 21% to 28%. The 21% rate was put in place by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Higher corporate income taxes would mean a decline in economic growth, according to the Tax Foundation. It also means higher revenue for tax-funded programs. The Tax Foundation says corporate taxes lead to more GDP loss than gain in revenue. Wharton’s analysis projects that Harris’ corporate tax rate would bring in $1.1 trillion in new revenue, which would offset just under half of her tax cut proposals.
Increase the stock buyback tax from 1% to 4%.
Create a minimum tax of 25% on both realized and unrealized income — also known as capital gains — for those earning above $100 million. Capital gains would also be taxed at death.
Hanauer says increasing taxes on wealthy people and corporations is something most Americans want. “We have a lot of needs in this country,” she says. “A lot of corporations just pay far, far too little in taxes. There are corporations out there, large, profitable corporations that pay a tax rate of zero because of the deductions and things that they’re able to get away with and then support very wealthy individuals, too.”
For small businesses, Harris would increase the deduction for business startup costs from $5,000 to $50,000. Hanauer says it’s unlikely to be as effective as it sounds because many new businesses don’t earn enough to pay taxes so it would take time for businesses to become profitable before they can even claim the deduction. “We just don’t think that that makes as much sense as some other approaches,” she says.
Lower the corporate income tax rate from 21% to 20%.
Lower the corporate income tax rate to 15% for companies that manufacture products in the U.S.
Tax large private university endowments.
Hanauer says the corporate income tax proposals aren’t well-targeted; would increase income and racial inequality; and would send a “massive windfall” of $0.40 of every dollar to foreign investors because those investors own 40% of corporate stocks.
“It would really cost us a lot in revenue, which could reduce the ability of either party to execute on their spending priorities,” she says.
Trump and Harris embrace no-tax-on-tips, experts say it’s bad policy
Both presidential candidates are embracing the promise to exempt workers from paying taxes on their tips. But the problem with no-tax-on-tips proposals, experts say, is that they’re clearly a bid for votes rather than a substantive solution to address the fundamental needs of tipped workers.
Housing-related taxes
Harris plans to expand housing tax credits including a low-income housing tax credit; a credit for the construction of new homes; and a 25,000 credit for first-time homebuyers plus an even bigger amount for first-generation homebuyers. Trump hasn’t spoken to housing taxes.
Harris has pledged to cut red tape to increase construction of new housing, but it’s unclear how that would work from a federal level when most housing red tape is at the local level. Hanauer says new housing is going to be key to her tax credits being an effective policy. “If you just give a tax credit to new homebuyers, it could end up driving up the cost of housing,” she says.
A Wharton’s analysis of Harris’ tax proposals projects that 1.4 million homebuyers annually would benefit from down payment assistance. It would cost the U.S. $140 billion over 10 years.
Tariffs
One of Trump’s most controversial economic proposals is his plan to enact 10% or 20% across-the-board tariffs on foreign imports with a 60% tariff on China. Harris has not taken a position on tariffs, but the Biden-Harris administration did maintain the tariffs instituted by the Trump administration.
The Tax Foundation estimates that Trump’s tariff proposals could fail to offset tax revenue losses from his tax cuts. The foundation also says the tariffs could offset the potential economic benefits of those proposals resulting in a reduction in GDP growth. The tariffs could also lead to a rise in the deficit over time and, as a result, a reduction in American income. The foundation also says the tariffs could potentially spark or deepen foreign trade wars.
Hanauer says the Center for Tax Policy finds that Trump’s tariffs would cost the typical household $2,600 per year in price increases. “So it’s a substantial hit to families and it manifests itself much in the way that inflation does,” she says. “Basically every product that every household buys would end up costing more, with the net result at the end of the year being that families would end up paying about $2,600 more in household goods.”
Photos by Spencer Platt and Win McNamee/Getty Images News via Getty Images.
How much drivers pay at the gas pump — averaging $3.22 per gallon in September — depends largely on the price of oil and the cost of refining it. But federal, state and local taxes and fees can add significantly to the total.
On top of a federal tax of 18.4 cents per gallon, most states levy multiple taxes and fees on a gallon of gas. Those include some combination of excise taxes (imposed on goods, services and activities), sales taxes, environmental taxes and inspection fees.
Those costs add up to an average of 32.6 cents per gallon in state taxes, according to a NerdWallet analysis of U.S. Energy Information Administration data. Combined with the federal tax, that’s about 51 cents per gallon, on average, factored into the gas prices you see at your local station.
States with the highest gas tax
State tax rates vary widely. California’s rate (69.8 cents per gallon) and Illinois’s rate (67.1 cents) are highest, followed by Pennsylvania (58.7 cents). Alaska has, by far, the lowest state tax (9 cents per gallon), followed by Mississippi (18.4 cents) and Hawaii (18.5 cents).
2024 state gas tax hikes
In many cases, gas taxes are adjusted annually based on the consumer price index, a proxy for inflation calculated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That means taxes may rise (or fall) with the annual rate of inflation. Sometimes states also phase in new or higher fees by increasing them incrementally.
As for what happens with that tax revenue, states often use it to fund infrastructure improvements and environmental initiatives.
Oct. 1 gas tax hike
Washington D.C.’s motor fuel surcharge will tick up slightly from 11.4 cents per gallon to 11.8 cents per gallon on Oct. 1, according to the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue. That fee is added to the district’s 23.5-cent sales tax on gasoline. Altogether, drivers pay 35.3 cents per gallon in state taxes when they fill up.
July 1 gas tax hikes
Gas taxes in seven states went up on July 1, generally by less than 2 cents.
California
California’s excise tax on gas rose from 57.9 cents per gallon to 59.6 cents per gallon, according to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. When other state taxes and fees are taken into account, the state tax on a gallon of fuel in California rose from about 68 cents to about 70 cents.
Colorado’s road usage fee increased from 3 cents per gallon to 4 cents per gallon, according to the Colorado Department of Revenue. Additionally, an environmental fee increased from 0.6 cents per gallon to about 1.3 cents per gallon. Those fees are on top of a 22-cent gas tax. Altogether, the state tax on gas increased from about 26 cents per gallon to about 28 cents per gallon.
The Illinois gas tax increased from 45.4 cents per gallon to 47 cents per gallon, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue. All told, the state tax on gas increased from 66.5 cents per gallon to 67.1 cents per gallon in state taxes — the second highest in the country.
In Indiana, the gas tax increased from 34 cents to 35 cents per gallon, according to the Indiana Department of Revenue. In addition to the excise tax and a 1-cent oil inspection fee, the state charges a gasoline use tax. That tax rate is adjusted on a monthly basis. In July, the use tax rate is 20.1 cents per gallon. In all, Indiana drivers pay state taxes totaling 56.1 cents per gallon.
Missouri’s motor fuel tax rate increased from 24.5 cents per gallon to 27 cents per gallon, according to the Missouri Department of Revenue. Combined with two other fees levied on a gallon of gas, totaling about half a cent, the state taxes add up to 27.5 cents per gallon.
Nebraska’s fuel tax rate went up half a cent to 29.6 cents per gallon, according to the Nebraska Department of Revenue. Combined with an environmental fee, drivers in the state pay 30.5 cents per gallon in state taxes.
The Virginia motor fuels tax rate increased from 29.8 cents per gallon of gas to 30.8 cents per gallon, according to the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles. The state’s motor vehicle fuels sales tax rate for gas increased from 8.7 cents per gallon to 9 cents. In all, motorists pay 40.4 cents per gallon in state taxes.
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money podcast, where we answer your real-world money questions. In this episode:
Get expert tips on how to pack for travel efficiently and effectively, including clever ways to save on baggage fees.
How can you keep luggage costs down during holiday travel? What are the best strategies for managing carry-on luggage, especially for international trips? Hosts Sean Pyles and Meghan Coyle discuss efficient luggage management to help you understand how to save money on baggage fees. They begin with a discussion of minimizing luggage costs, with tips and tricks on rolling clothes, borrowing essentials from family members, and sticking to a carry-on bag. Then, travel writer Jessie Beck joins Meghan to discuss effective packing techniques, including the benefits of using smaller bags to prevent overpacking, creating a versatile travel capsule wardrobe, and dealing with potential issues like gate-checked bags and delayed luggage. They also cover the importance of miniaturizing items such as wallets, using airline apps and AirTags to track luggage, and understanding airline compensation policies for delayed bags.
Check out this episode on your favorite podcast platform, including:
NerdWallet stories related to this episode:
Episode transcript
This transcript was generated from podcast audio by an AI tool.
Sean Pyles:
Are you really bringing all that? Do you need everything in that bag? Are you sure? Couldn’t you do with just one pair of shoes instead of, oh, six? Well, if not, you’re probably going to pay a pretty penny for luggage when you’re traveling over the holidays. We’ve got some timely advice for keeping those costs down.
Jessie Beck:
Once you add on the cost of paying to have a carry-on bag on that basic economy ticket, you might as well just get an economy ticket and be able to be a little bit more flexible. I think that’s the most important thing for me. If I did have to make a last minute change, I can do that penalty-free.
Sean Pyles:
Welcome to NerdWallet’s Smart Money podcast. I’m Sean Pyles.
Meghan Coyle:
I’m Meghan Coyle.
Sean Pyles:
This is episode three of our nerdy deep dive into holiday travel and the costs therein. Meghan, I know there are plenty of folks out there who are strict carry-on only travelers, and I am one of them. I’ve not checked a bag in over a decade.
Meghan Coyle:
Wow! You’re one of them. Okay. There’s a lot to be said for that strategy, as long as you can live with fewer choices. There’s a whole cottage industry around figuring out the best ways to stuff small suitcases and even wear multiple articles and layers of clothing on the plane, so they’re not even in a bag.
Sean Pyles:
I have not gone that far yet. I mostly try to roll my clothes as tightly as possible, so I can still have options while fitting everything in my carry-on. There are multiple reasons to restrict yourself like this, though. One is that your luggage will never be lost.
Meghan Coyle:
Oh, man. Remember that period a couple years back, when people were losing their luggage all over European airports?
Sean Pyles:
Yeah. What a nightmare. When you go carry-on, there’s no losing your bag, no worrying about stuff getting stolen out of it. Another benefit to carry-on only is that you don’t have to pay luxurious fees to check your bags. You could put a kid or two through college for what it costs to have your bag fly in the cargo hold. I exaggerate a little bit, of course. But honestly, the fees are pretty bad when you add them on top of airfare.
Meghan Coyle:
And choosing your seat, and your airplane snacks.
Sean Pyles:
Yeah. I’m carry-on only for two main reasons. The first is that I am impatient. I do not want to wait at baggage claim to collect my suitcase after I’ve spent however many hours traveling. And two, I try to be in control of my own destiny as much as possible. Handing off my bag to some airline and hoping it gets to my final destination is just not how I roll. And yes, that’s a suitcase pun.
Meghan Coyle:
I’m also a carry-on type of person most of the time. I hate waiting at the luggage carousel after a flight. I want to be at my destination already. Sean, not everyone can smoosh everything into a bag that fits in the overhead bin or under their seat. Especially in the winter, and that includes holiday travel. If you’re going anywhere with a possibility of snow, ice, frigid temperatures, you’ve got to have the boots, you’ve got to have the sweaters, you’ve got to have the puffer coats. Or if you’re escaping to the tropics, I don’t know, maybe you need 40 sets of swimsuits. Whatever the reason, if you’re a bag checker, we’ve got some tips for you to try to bring the cost down.
Sean Pyles:
All right. Well, we want to hear what you think too, listeners. To share your ideas and experiences around holiday travel with us, the good, the bad, and the insanity, leave us a voicemail or text the Nerd hotline at 901-730-6373. That’s 901-730-NERD. Or email a voice memo to [email protected]. Meghan, who’s talking luggage with us today?
Meghan Coyle:
Our guest today is Jessie Beck. She’s a San Francisco-based travel writer for Afar, a travel magazine, and she’s done plenty of packing and unpacking in her career. She’ll share her knowledge of all things baggage.
Sean Pyles:
That’s coming up in a moment. Stay with us.
Meghan Coyle:
Jessie Beck, welcome to Smart Money.
Jessie Beck:
Hi, Meghan. Thank you for having me.
Meghan Coyle:
Tell us, what are your travel plans this year for the holidays?
Jessie Beck:
Oh, that’s a good question. For Thanksgiving, my husband and I are going back to the East Coast to visit family. But for Christmas, we’re taking advantage of the fact that we both have a lot of time PTO around that time, so we’re going to go to Japan. See the family another time, when it’s warmer.
Meghan Coyle:
Oh my goodness, that sounds incredible. Have you been to Japan before?
Jessie Beck:
Actually, we’re going back to a hotel that we stayed in in February 2020, right when the pandemic was starting in Japan. Really excited to go back and say hello again.
Meghan Coyle:
Well, let’s get right into it. How much luggage are you taking with you for each of those trips?
Jessie Beck:
I am a pretty avid carry-on only packer. Actually, that last trip I took to Japan in the winter to ski season, I only did with a 40-liter backpack and a small purse as my personal items.
Meghan Coyle:
Okay. How many coats were you wearing on the airplane?
Jessie Beck:
One very large coat, and I was very hot.
Meghan Coyle:
Are you going to do the carry-on only for both your domestic trip and your international trip?
Jessie Beck:
Yes, definitely. I think it’s almost a little easier when you’re traveling to visit family, because I’ve got a sister-in-law I can borrow clothes from. They’ll have extra hats and mittens, and all those kinds of things. If you forget your toothpaste, family will step in. Sports or ski trips can be a little bit trickier to stick to the carry-on luggage.
Meghan Coyle:
Tell us exactly what kind of bag you’re using for these carry-on only trips.
Jessie Beck:
I’ve always wondered how big the backpack cohort is, in terms of luggage enthusiasts. I’ve always used a travel backpack. I really love how much easier it is to move around the world with a backpack. I know some people will disagree with me because they’re heavy, and all that stuff.
Meghan Coyle:
For people who don’t normally travel with backpacks, can you tell us what is the difference between a travel-specific backpack and just the backpack you use to carry your laptop, or to go to school or work?
Jessie Beck:
Oh my gosh. This is so embarrassing, but when I first started traveling a lot in college and right after, I was using this massive hiking backpack that I just found in my parents’ garage. It was way too big. But it was also really difficult to get access to anything within the bag, because a traditional hiking backpack is top-loading, so you’ll usually see the opening of the backpack at the top of it. Maybe you’ll have a zipper at the bottom, to be able to access things at the bottom of the backpack.
But a lot of travel-specific backpacks will have a clamshell opening. They’re opening a little bit more similarly to a suitcase, and that makes it a lot easier to open your bag and see everything that’s inside it without having to take all the stuff that’s on the top out. A lot of them will also have some additional pockets and organizational features. Some of them will also design with carry-on restrictions in mind, so they’re really trying to keep it under that 40-liter limit.
Meghan Coyle:
Yeah. One of the features I really like about my travel backpack, I have one from Dagne Dover, is that it has the sleeve on the back of it so that it can very snugly fit over your carry-on rolling suitcase, if you decide to do both backpack and suitcase. I really love that feature.<br>Let’s get back to your travels. How much is that going to cost you to travel backpack-only?
Jessie Beck:
For just the luggage, I will not be spending anything to bring a bag with me on either flight. I’ve noticed, and this is purely anecdotal, I almost never have my bag gate-checked when I’m wearing a backpack. If there’s any other backpackers out there who have had a different experience, I would love to know. But I am operating under this theory that backpack people don’t get gate-checked as often as suitcase people. Not only am I not spending any money, but I generally keep my luggage with me.
Meghan Coyle:
For people who are going to take a carry-on bag or checked baggage, how much would you say they need to budget for bags if they’re traveling for the holidays this year?
Jessie Beck:
In terms of price for checking a bag?
Meghan Coyle:
Yeah. Or even bringing a carry-on, in some cases.
Jessie Beck:
That’s true. Some airlines are now charging for carry-on bags. I always do that calculation as I’m booking the ticket. For example, I’ve tried basic economy a total of one time.
Meghan Coyle:
Jessie Beck:
I was like, “Okay, I’m a light packer. I can do this. Personal item only, visiting a friend in Chicago in the summer, easy. No problem. Got it.” But I think for most scenarios beyond that, the things you’re losing by going from an economy ticket to a basic economy ticket don’t make that savings worth it, especially if you want to bring a carry-on bag. Once you add on the cost of paying to have a carry-on bag on that basic economy ticket, you might as well just get an economy ticket and be able to be a little bit more flexible. I think that’s the most important thing for me. If I did have to make a last-minute change, I can do that penalty-free, whereas you can’t do that with a basic economy ticket.
It definitely varies by airline. You’re probably going to end up spending somewhere between 30 and 50 each way. Definitely do that calculation and that math before you book your ticket, because if you’re traveling with a bunch of luggage, basic economy is not the way to go.
Meghan Coyle:
I totally agree. It makes it hard to compare prices when you’re looking at basic economy, versus economy, versus budget airlines. There’s so much you have to add up before you make your choice, based on price.
Jessie Beck:
I wish Google Flights had an easy feature where you could add all of that up to the total price of your ticket so you could see the actual cost of what your ticket’s going to be. But in short of that, a simple spreadsheet works. I’m super nerdy, I love a spreadsheet.
Meghan Coyle:
Same, same.
Jessie Beck:
Meghan Coyle:
Tell us what has happened to bag prices this year. If people haven’t traveled since the last holiday season, they might be a little surprised when they do go to check out and see the bag fees.
Jessie Beck:
I’m going to be totally honest, I haven’t been keeping tabs too much on this specific story because I am such a carry-on only packer. Though, one change that I was really excited to see is some airlines are now considering sporting equipment, like bikes, as just a regular bag, whereas previously they were not. That’s something I encountered recently this summer, when I was traveling with a bike. I had traveled with a bike previously on United Airlines, and they were charging me $200 each way to fly with this bike. I was like, “That is ridiculous.”
Meghan Coyle:
Yeah. That could be more than the ticket in some cases, I would imagine.
Jessie Beck:
For domestic, at least, I switched to Alaska Airlines when I was traveling with a bike because they always treated bikes as regular luggage, so as long as it stayed under 50 pounds. But recently, United changed their rules as well, so they, too, are now qualifying a bike as regular luggage. That’s probably the one change I’ve been paying attention to the most because that’s pretty much the only time I ever check a bag, is with a bike.
Meghan Coyle:
One story I’ve been following this year was bag fees not only went up across several airlines, and it’s a pretty nominal amount. Delta, United, American, Alaska, all of those airlines raised their bag fees by $5, in some cases $10. There’s a difference between if you check your bag before you get to the airport, when you’re booking your ticket, or if you wait until you’re literally at that kiosk checking in and you add a bag there. But the one that interested me the most was that JetBlue even added peak and off-peak pricing to their bags. Get this. They basically published a set of dates for peak pricing for your bags, where your bags will cost $5 to $10 more than their normal pricing. Of course, the peak pricing is during the holidays.
Jessie Beck:
Meghan Coyle:
If there is a way to, like you said, visit your family and borrow some toothpaste, I would say if you’re flying JetBlue, this might be a good time to try it out. What are some other ways to save on bag prices?
Jessie Beck:
You brought up one good point, which is that some airlines will charge you more if you’re paying at the airport versus paying for your checked bag in advance. Again, not a ton of money. No one’s going to hate on saving $5 or $10. Credit cards are another good way to save on checked baggage fees. If you have airline-branded credit cards, then you can check that bag for free. That’s a good option if you travel often. If you’re only traveling once or twice a year, I don’t know if an airline-branded credit card is really the best option. But if you are traveling frequently and you have that, that’s something to look into. Or if you’re traveling with other people, try to consolidate so you’re only checking one bag between the two of you, or something. There’s a bunch of ways to get creative and just minimize how much you’re bringing or checking with the airlines.
Meghan Coyle:
It has so many benefits beyond just saving money. If you have just one bag to worry about, it brings you so much peace of mind in other ways of traveling as well. Tell us a little bit about your travel history and when this idea of being team carry-on only really started to resonate with you.
Jessie Beck:
It’s been a process. I started by reducing from that 65-liter, to buying a 45-liter backpack. I traveled with that for quite a while. Including when I was in the Peace Corps, that’s the main luggage that I brought with me, along with a day bag. Then in my two years in the Peace Corps, I actually tried to minimize even further. Mostly because, in the country where I was at, Madagascar, you’re mostly traveling by bus. If your luggage cannot fit in your lap or under the seat in front of you on those buses, it goes above the bus. Which normally, wouldn’t sound like such a bad idea, except it’s not covered. If it rains, your luggage gets wet. I ended up with a soggy bag full of clothes and was like, “I’m never doing this again. I’m just going to bring two outfits next time I travel, because they’re going to stay dry.”
Meghan Coyle:
Oh my goodness.
Jessie Beck:
I’m never putting anything on the roof.
Meghan Coyle:
Yeah. Oh, what a bummer to have soggy luggage.
Jessie Beck:
Meghan Coyle:
What is your packing strategy, then? To be able to fit everything in such a small bag?
Jessie Beck:
It can be intimidating to try and go from a lot of luggage to a very small amount. Just start small, try to reduce what you’re carrying by maybe 10 liters, five liters. Some of the strategies that I’ve found really effective. The first one is get a smaller bag. We all have this case where, if our bag is bigger and we have extra space, we’re going to fill it. I was traveling with a friend to Portland over the weekend, and she had exactly that scenario. She packed everything she needed for the weekend. Then she said she had half of her bag empty, so she decided to just start throwing in some extra sneakers and some extra towels and all these things that she didn’t really need, just because she had the space. I think that’s a really good forcing function, is get a smaller bag. Don’t give yourself the opportunity to pack those things you don’t really need in the first place. That can be a really helpful place to start.
Meghan Coyle:
It’s like when you have a smaller dinner plate and you don’t fill your plate as much.
Jessie Beck:
Meghan Coyle:
Because there’s just less space for it.
Jessie Beck:
Yes, so true. I think there’s probably some psychological reasoning for all of this. But yeah, definitely noticed it works.
Meghan Coyle:
What else are you doing? What is a must pack for you, in terms of your carry-on?
Jessie Beck:
The other two things I do. One, I miniaturize or bring a travel-sized version of everything. I’ve even taken my giant wallet and gotten a super small travel-friendly wallet. It seems like a small thing to just go to a smaller wallet. But when you do that across a bunch of different items, you can get from a medium-sized bag to a small bag worth of things. The other thing I do is I do a travel capsule wardrobe. This is taking that capsule wardrobe approach, but travelizing it. So instead of 30 items of clothing for your full season, which is what a lot of capsule wardrobe enthusiasts will recommend, I’m focusing more on 10 to 12 items of clothing. Plus your PJs, underwear, and no more than two pairs of shoes. I think that’s a big one, too.
Meghan Coyle:
Oh, the shoes take up so much space.
Jessie Beck:
Meghan Coyle:
It’s so hard to choose just two shoes.
Jessie Beck:
I know. It really is.
Meghan Coyle:
Let’s get to what happens if your bag does get gate-checked, you get separated from your bag somehow. Are there any things you do to give yourself some peace of mind so you know you’ll get your bag back or be able to locate it?
Jessie Beck:
The number one thing, always download the airline app. Even if it’s an airline that you don’t fly very frequently, always, always, always download that app before you go. They can provide a lot of information and services just through that app on your phone. A lot of airlines will allow you to track the status of your bag through their app. Whenever the barcode on that tag is being scanned on your luggage, it’s going to update in that app. It’s going to tell you where it is. If you have a connection, it’ll tell you if your bag made the flight with you.
Another thing that other people like to do is putting an AirTag or something similar in their luggage, just to be able to see that location. I do that with my bikes, just because those are really expensive and I want to make sure that they’re not getting lost somewhere. That’s definitely a nice way to keep peace of mind with your luggage.
Meghan Coyle:
What are some airline policies around compensation for delayed or lost bags? Just in case something does happen to it, what should customers know about getting some sort of reimbursement for that?
Jessie Beck:
I know there’s more than one, but definitely Alaska Airlines. Then I think it’s Delta. Both of them will compensate you if your bag is late. I think a lot of people don’t know this, which is a super nice tip to keep in mind. If it takes more than 20 minutes to get to the carousel, you can write in and get some miles as compensation for that bag being late. I forget what Delta’s policy is.
Meghan Coyle:
I think it’s 2,500 miles if your bag doesn’t show up in 20 minutes. So yeah, very similar.
Jessie Beck:
Exactly. That’s a decent amount of miles just for being like, “My bag was 10 minutes late.” And it takes you a couple minutes to write in and say, “Hey, my bag was late. Can you compensate me?” I think a lot of people don’t take advantage of that.
Meghan Coyle:
I agree. It just takes that one extra step of looking up the online form. But then, it’s an easy way to get miles. At least you got a little something for waiting at baggage claim for so long. One other tip I always like to remind people is that your travel credit card might always have some lost luggage or delayed luggage reimbursement. This doesn’t really help in the moment when it’s happening and you’re like, “Where’s my bag?” But it could help you get reimbursement for anything new you had to buy. If they actually did lose your luggage, you might be able to get reimbursed for any valuables in your bag. Something to keep in mind is that you should try to book your travel with a travel credit card that has those kinds of protections if you have one.
Jessie Beck:
Yeah. That’s a really good one to keep in mind.
Meghan Coyle:
Jessie Beck, thank you so much for helping us out today.
Jessie Beck:
Yeah, of course. Thank you for having me. It was great speaking with you.
Sean Pyles:
Jessie’s experience of downsizing her packing is something that I can really relate to. I will admit that I am a recovering over-packer. Historically, I’ve tried to cram as much as possible into my suitcase. But over the past year or two, I’ve gotten much better at selecting just a couple of staples that I can mix-and-match. I may have fewer options on the whole, but it helps me get creative. I’m basically doing a less intentional version of that whole capsule wardrobe thing that you and Jessie talked about. I found that my suitcase is lighter, which makes traveling easier. And I also just have more room for souvenirs from my travels.
Meghan Coyle:
I think the real lesson here is that you do have options. You can take little baby steps to become someone who travels light. Sometimes, you just have to make those decisions based on who you are. Some people are fine wearing the same clothes day in and day out for a week-long holiday stay. Others want a new outfit every day plus room for shopping. We say you do you. But definitely look into some of the ways to cut down on those baggage fees through credit card benefits or other means.
Sean Pyles:
Agreed. As long as you’re prepared for the possibility that your luggage could end up hanging out somewhere in an airport, or even in another country without you, well, then it’s up to you to take that risk. Me? No giant suitcases, no problems. And then I have more money to spend on margaritas.
Meghan Coyle:
Luggage fees versus margaritas, is that what this has come to? I’ll join you.
Sean Pyles:
Meghan, tell us what’s coming up in episode four of the series.
Meghan Coyle:
Next time, we’re going to focus on people traveling internationally, either for holidays or any upcoming trip abroad, and what you should know about traveling with your debit and credit cards. Plus, how to save on getting local currency.
Craig Joseph:
As long as there’s a mobile signal, you can now use a card in a lot of situations where you previously couldn’t. That means you don’t have to carry as much cash, which is obviously safer, and credit card purchase protections cover you from fraud, in case you swipe the card in the wrong place.
Meghan Coyle:
For now, that’s all we have for this episode. Do you have a money question of your own? Turn to the Nerds and call or text us at 901-730-6373. That’s 901-730-NERD. You can also email us at [email protected]. And remember, you can follow the show on your favorite podcast app, including Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and iHeart Radio, to automatically download new episodes.
Sean Pyles:
This episode was produced by Tess Vigeland. I helped with editing. Claire Tsosie helped with fact checking. And a big thank you to NerdWallet’s editors for all their help.
Meghan Coyle:
Here’s our brief disclaimer. We are not financial or investment advisors. This nerdy info is provided for general educational and entertainment purposes and may not apply to your specific circumstances.
Sean Pyles:
With that said, until next time, turn to the Nerds.