Browse by Topic

Source: mint.intuit.com

Apache is functioning normally

When I was considering leaving my full-time job, I had some concerns. My main concern? Health insurance. And it wasn’t just me. Since my husband didn’t have health insurance coverage through his job, he had been covered under my policy for years. Plus, we were going to be adding kids to our family, so we needed to think about them too.

First, we took care of my husband’s needs. About a year ago, he started looking for a private health insurance plan — and since he is a healthy guy, he found an inexpensive one rather easily. And once we adopted the kids, they could also go on his plan with no problems.

So that left me. If I quit my job, I had a few options: 1. Find my own private health insurance plan 2. Go without insurance 3. COBRA 4. Find a non-insurance alternative.

A history of cancer, although it was a very minor case, eliminated finding my own private health insurance plan…at least for 2013. The Affordable Care Act would have eliminated that, of course, but not until 2014. Going without insurance seemed like a crazy choice, especially since medical bills are the number one cause of bankruptcy. For approximately $1,000 per month, I also could have gone on COBRA. I strongly considered using COBRA as a “bridge” to help me make it to the day when my preexisting condition would be covered. However, the last option, finding a non-insurance alternative, was the one I chose. Here is why, how it works, and what I think of it so far.

Although I do not have health insurance, what I do have is an eligible option under the Affordable Care Act. It’s a medical cost-sharing plan that is available to Christians who follow certain guidelines including moderate use of alcohol, and no tobacco or illegal drug use. Although I was unable to find similar options available to people who weren’t Christians, I think creating something like this would be amazing. Like, the vegetarian medical-cost-sharing plan, or the Paleo cost-sharing plan, or basically any overall healthy group. But I digress.

How It Works

When I signed up, I had to choose a level which determined the amount of money that I pay each month. The highest level requires the member to pay $500 per incident. An incident could include surgery, a broken bone, or pregnancy. For instance, if I needed to have my appendix removed, I would be responsible for the first $500 of all doctor/hospital/lab bills, but that’s it. On the other hand, if I have an annual physical that costs $400 with associated labs and testing, I would pay for all of it because I didn’t exceed $500 per incident. Ditto for the next incident. The other levels are less expensive, but require more member financial responsibility.

So each month, I send in my voluntary gift amount (not called a premium since this is not health insurance). This money gets sent to an escrow account, which is then distributed to other members, according to their eligible medical expenses. Certain medical expenses are not eligible, including more recent preexisting conditions. Each month, I get a newsletter that lists members who have ineligible expenses. If I want to, I can send extra money to be used for their expenses.

I’ll be honest: After over a decade of having regular health insurance, this felt like a scary option. But I have seen it work. As I have mentioned several times, my father had terminal cancer years ago. He had multiple surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, visits to the Mayo Clinic, and many other tests. And he had the same medical-cost-sharing plan as well. His bills were paid, so I knew the plan worked for him. I just hoped that it would work for me.

What I Think so Far

Wouldn’t you know, I had an incident about 10 weeks after signing up. I have paid almost $1,000 in bills so far with more to come, but I have submitted all my itemized bills to the organization, and I am waiting to be reimbursed for all my expenses, minus the first $500. (Just FYI, they do not recommend personally paying bills that are over $1,000. Instead, they recommend that these bills are submitted directly to the organization.) Additionally, I was not required to pay more than $500, but it can take 60 to 90 days for bills to be paid. Since we had the money in savings, I preferred to pay the bills and wait for reimbursements. But that’s just me.)

Another marked difference is my role in my health care now. I didn’t bother to shop around for my medical care before, because no matter which hospital or doctor I chose, I incurred the same costs. But now, I shop around. For instance, when I needed some lab testing, I could have chosen to go to my usual hospital lab or I could have gone to an independent lab, which was half the cost. I chose the independent lab.

Since I am officially a self-pay patient, I have also asked all my providers for discounts. Every time (except once), I did get a discount off my bill, all the way up to 20 percent off. I thought it would be awkward, since I hate negotiating, but it hasn’t been a big deal at all. I just simply say, “Do you offer discounts for self-pay patients?” If they do, super. If not, I deal with it. I also don’t feel bad about it, because insurance companies don’t pay the full price either. In fact, my doctor’s office is small and doesn’t have a standard discount for self-pay patients, so they bill me at the Blue Cross/Blue Shield contract rates.

We were notified that my husband’s and children’s insurance costs are going to double effective January 1, 2014, so I am also considering signing them up too. Our monthly costs, should all of us be on this plan, would be about half of what it would be otherwise. Other than financial benefits, I feel like I am more involved in my health care, and it hasn’t felt more complicated…yet. And this probably sounds really idiotic (like, why wouldn’t I have done this anyway?), but since I am on the hook for more of my costs, I am trying to be more healthful in general so my costs stay down over time.

If interested, here are some medical-cost-sharing websites for further research:

www.samaritanministries.org

www.chministries.org

www.mychristiancare.org

Source: getrichslowly.org

Apache is functioning normally

Now that tapping home equity is back in fashion, I figured it’d be helpful to see who the top HELOC lenders are.

Last year, banks and mortgage lenders doled out nearly one million home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), per HMDA data.

A total of 962,000 HELOCs were opened in 2021, up 10.7% from the 869,000 originated in 2020, the first annual increase in three years.

I expect HELOC originations to rise again in 2022 now that mortgage rates on existing first mortgages are so low relative to what’s available today.

Read on to see who the top HELOC originators were last year.

Top HELOC Lenders

Ranking Company Name 2021 Loan Count
1. Citizens Bank 48,992
2. PNC Bank 40,566
3. Truist 40,088
4. U.S. Bank 34,470
5. Bank of America 31,375
6. Huntington Bank 27,783
7. Third Federal 16,449
8. Figure Lending 14,726
9. Regions Bank 13,266
10. Boeing Employees CU 13,202
11. Mountain America CU 12,241
12. Zions Bank 11,127
13. State Employees CU 11,053
14. PenFed 10,362
15. KeyBank 10,238
16. Fifth Third 10,194
17. TD Bank 9,536
18. First Citizens 9,518
19. M&T Bank 9,287
20. America First CU 9,065
21. BMO Bank 8,870
22. Bank of the West 8,395
23. Alliant CU 7,992
24. Idaho Central CU 7,413
25. Ent CU 7,399

Last year, Citizens Bank led all HELOC lenders with nearly 50,000 lines of credit originated (48,992), representing a solid 5.1% market share, per HMDA data from the CFPB.

They were followed by PNC Bank with 40,566 HELOCs originated for a 4.2% share.

A similar total was generated by Truist Bank (40,088) for a market share of 4.2%.

U.S. Bank took third with 34,470 HELOCs opened and a 3.6% market share, followed by Bank of America with 31,375 lines of credit opened for a 3.3% market share.

In 2020, Bank of America had been the #1 HELOC lender with a 5.6% market share before falling to fifth in 2021.

Huntington Bank took sixth with a 2.9% market share, Third Federal came in seventh with a 1.7% share of the market, and newcomer Figure Lending took eighth with a 1.5% market share.

Regions Bank and Boeing Employees Credit Union rounded out the top 10 with 1.4% of the market, each.

You can see the top 25 HELOC lenders in the above table for more details. These 25 institutions alone accounted for 44% of the overall HELOC market.

Looking for a HELOC? Try a Depository Institution

If you’re in need of a HELOC, know that they’re mostly offered by depository institutions, also known as DIs.

In 2021, 809 DIs, including 271 banks and 538 credit unions, originated 934,000 HELOCs, per the HMDA data.

That represented 97.1% of all HELOC originations reported. In other words, practically every HELOC was opened by a bank or a credit union.

This differs from first mortgages, which have been dominated by nonbank lenders over the past several years.

These nonbank lenders, or non-DIs, accounted for just 2.9% of the HELOC market.

For the record, just one of the top 25 HELOC lenders was an independent mortgage company, Figure Lending.

It’s unclear if that will change in 2022 and beyond, though these companies are looking to get in on the action by offering HELOCs and home equity loans.

For example, Rocket Mortgage launched a closed-end home equity loan (HEL) in early August.

Meanwhile, wholesale lender United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM) released two HELOCs, including a standalone and a piggyback.

Regardless, there’s a good chance a local credit union (or the bank you already do business with) will offer HELOCs.

Who Are the Best HELOC Lenders?

So we know it’s mostly banks and credit unions that offer HELOCs. The question is which one is the best of the bunch?

That’s hard to quantify because banks and credit unions offer lots of different products, not just HELOCs.

As such, reading their reviews probably won’t give us a lot to chew on. Sure, we can see how they are rated on the whole.

But that might mean nothing with regard to their home equity lending.

You still want them to have favorable ratings, but that aside, I would look at the interest rate and loan term offered.

HELOC rates can range quite a bit from bank to bank, so put in the time to see who is offering what.

And pay attention to the margin (which is added to the prime rate), the loan term (how many years to draw and pay it off), and the starting interest rate.

Also take note of any perks such as the ability to lock in your rate so it’s no longer adjustable.

Though the way things are going, HELOC rates might peak in 2023 before beginning to flatten or fall as the Fed stops raising rates (and maybe even lowers them).

Either way, be sure to exhaust all your options in your HELOC search to ensure you don’t miss out on a better deal.

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com

Apache is functioning normally

Back in July, the NCAA granted college athletes the opportunity to make money by using their “name, image and likeness” (NIL).

This means getting paid to sign autographs, make appearances, or promote products and services, among other things.

Importantly, it keeps college sports from turning into pay-for-play schemes, while also providing clarity to student-athletes and their families.

These NIL opportunities are beginning to materialize, and we now have what appears to be the first mortgage-related deal.

The nation’s second largest mortgage lender, United Wholesale Mortgage, is offering $500 per month to Michigan State University (MSU) athletes.

Because UWM is a wholesale mortgage lender, these athletes will essentially be promoting the mortgage broker model.

MSU Athletes Can Earn $500 Per Month for the 2021-2022 Season

This new partnership involves MSU men’s basketball and football players, of which there are 133 in total.

Each one will have the opportunity to earn $500 per month for the 2021-2022 season, which will amount to $6,000 per player.

In terms of how they’ll market UWM, it’ll apparently be via social media channels as opposed to a clothing partnership.

Per Crain’s Detroit Business, the MSU players won’t “be required to wear UWM logos on their jerseys.”

This differs from UWM’s earlier deal with the Detroit Pistons, in which their logo will feature on the left front strap of official team jerseys for the 2021-22 NBA season.

So expect all your favorite MSU student-athletes to pitch mortgage brokers and specifically UWM on Instagram and other social media platforms.

Rocket Mortgage Is the Official Mortgage Provider of MSU Athletics

What makes this story a little more interesting is the fact that UWM isn’t even the “official mortgage provider” of MSU.

That title goes to crosstown rival Rocket Mortgage, which recently inked a new five-year deal to be the presenting sponsor of the men’s basketball team.

If you visit the Breslin Center for a hoops game, you’ll see signage that reads “MSU Spartans Presented by Rocket Mortgage.”

There will also be “considerable branding” throughout the Breslin Center and Spartan Stadium for Rocket Mortgage.

Notably, the Rocket Mortgage logo will be “prominently displayed” on MSU football coach Mel Tucker’s headset, along with the MSU men’s and women’s basketball team benches and clipboards.

So while the players may be pitching UWM, they’ll have to compete with the massive Rocket brand campaign at the same time.

Rocket Mortgage and UWM Founders Are Both Michigan State Alum

As to why MSU appears to be the crown jewel to both the #1 and #2 mortgage company in the United States, it has a little to do with history.

It just so happens to be the alma mater of Rocket Mortgage founder Dan Gilbert, along with current UWM president and CEO Mat Ishbia.

Ishbia is actually the founder’s son, and joined UWM as its 12th team member after briefly coaching the MSU basketball team alongside Tom Izzo.

Before that, Ishbia also won a national championship with the Spartans basketball team back in 2000.

Both Rocket Mortgage and UWM have also been very active in metro Detroit and nearby, contributing to revitalization efforts in the state.

So it appears this is a sort of battle between the companies, which constantly exchange jabs in somewhat subtle, yet not so subtle ways.

This latest exchange makes MSU the venue for a proxy war between retail mortgage lending and wholesale lending, the latter fueled by mortgage brokers.

For the record, Rocket Mortgage also announced that through new and expanded multi-year deals, it now has partnerships with 25 of the “most influential and prestigious athletic programs” in the nation.

That list includes four Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs): Grambling State, Howard, Jackson State, and Southern University.

Perhaps the Rocket/UWM rivalry is better than college sports…

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com

Apache is functioning normally

If you’re a senior, you might be wondering who the top reverse mortgage lenders in the nation are.

Unlike the traditional home loan market, the reverse mortgage industry is dominated by a small handful of companies.

Typically, these lenders specialize in reverse mortgage lending, as opposed to simply offering the loans alongside other options.

As a quick refresher, a reverse mortgage loan allows homeowners 62 and older (55 in some cases) to access cash in their property without monthly payments.

In 2021, reverse lenders originated 59,000 loans, a 36% increase from the 43,000 the year prior. Read on to see who made the top-10 list last year.

Top Reverse Mortgage Lenders

Ranking Company Name 2021 Loan Count
1. AAG 18,407 (31.3% share)
2. FOA Reverse 10,575 (18% share)
3. Reverse Mortgage Funding 6,177 (10.5% share)
4. PHH Mortgage 4,319 (7.3% share)
5. Mutual of Omaha 4,101 (7% share)
6. Longbridge Financial 3,636 (6.2% share)
7. Cornerstone First 3,296 (5.6% share)
8. Open Mortgage 2,444 (4.2% share)
9. HighTechLending 1,144 (1.9% share)
10. Nationwide Equities 705 (1.2% share)

Last year, the top reverse mortgage lender in the country was American Advisors Group, or AAG for short.

The company originated more than 18,000 reverse mortgages in 2021, per HMDA data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

While that might not sound like a lot of loans, it represented a staggering 31.3% market share.

So one company grabbed nearly a third of the entire reverse mortgage market. And yes, actor Tom Selleck of Magnum P.I. fame has been their spokesperson for a while now.

For perspective, the nation’s #1 mortgage lender (for forward mortgages), Rocket Mortgage, held an 8.8% market share in 2021.

AAG was also number one in 2020 with a slightly higher 35% market share.

In second place was Finance of America Reverse, the reverse mortgage division of FOA.

The company funded more than 10,500 reverse mortgages during the year, giving them an also impressive 18% market share. They ranked second in 2020 also with a 20.2% share.

Coming in third was Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC, which originated more than 6,000 loans for a 10.5% market share. They were third a year earlier as well with a very similar share.

In fourth was PHH Mortgage, which also offers forward mortgages to customers. The company managed to originate more than 4,300 reverse loans for a 7.3% market share.

Rounding out the top five was Mutual of Omaha Mortgage with about 4,100 loans funded for a 7% share of the market.

Collectively, the top five reverse mortgage lenders held about 75% of the overall market.

In sixth was Longbridge Financial with 3,600 loans funded and a 6.2% market share.

Seventh place went to Cornerstone First Financial with nearly 3,300 reverse loans funded for a 5.6% market share.

Behind them was Open Mortgage with nearly 2,500 reverse mortgages originated for a 4.2% share of the market.

HighTechLending Inc. (dba American Senior) took ninth with about 1,150 loans funded and a 1.9% market share, followed by Nationwide Equities Corp. with 705 loans and a 1.2% share.

Altogether, the top 10 reverse mortgage lenders held about a 93% share of the overall market.

Who Are the Top Rated Reverse Mortgage Companies?

We know who the biggest reverse mortgage lenders in the country are, but what about best?

That’s a different story, and one that can be difficult to quantify due to the many ratings websites out there.

However, I did some digging to find a good sample size of reviews for each company listed to see what customers think of them. We’ll also check out their Better Business Bureau (BBB) rating.

Starting with AAG, they have an “excellent” 4.5/5 score on Trustpilot from nearly 5,000 customer reviews. Their BBB rating is currently a ‘B+.’

Finance of America Reverse has a “great” 4/5 score on Trustpilot from about 500 reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC has an excellent 4.6/5 score on Trustpilot from nearly 600 reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

PHH Mortgage has a 3.9/5 on Consumer Affairs from about 600 reviews and a ‘B+’ BBB rating. Other review sites didn’t have a large enough sample size.

Mutual of Omaha Reverse has a 3.9/5 score on Trustpilot from over 100 reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

Longbridge Financial has a 4.8/5 score on Trustpilot from nearly 800 reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

Cornerstone First Financial has a 4.9 rating from about 250 Google reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

Open Mortgage has a 4.91/5 on Zillow from about 25 reviews (most I could find) and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

HighTechLending Inc. (dba American Senior) has a 4.95/5 on Zillow from about 110 reviews and an ‘A+’ BBB rating.

Lastly, Nationwide Equities Corp. has a 4.98/5 on Zillow from roughly 110 reviews and an ‘A’ BBB rating.

Remember to look beyond just the top names and also consider mortgage brokers, local credit unions, and more for in your search for a reverse mortgage.

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com